Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #149 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 10.0 | 6.8 | $0.092 | 2/2 | 16.5s | |
| #66 | Kimi K3 max | Moonshot AI | 7.3 | 7.9 | $3.467 | 1/2 | 16.7s |
| #176 | Mimo V2 PRO medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.3 | $0.333 | 1/2 | 17.2s |
| #280 | Cobuddy medium | Baidu | 6.3 | 4.7 | $0.000 | 1/2 | 17.4s |
| #212 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.050 | 2/2 | 18.2s |
| #142 | Seed-2.0-Code medium | Bytedance Seed | 7.3 | 6.8 | $1.153 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #147 | MiMo-V2.5-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 7.3 | 6.8 | $0.221 | 1/2 | 18.8s |
| #126 | Grok 4.3 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | $0.741 | 2/2 | 19.0s |
| #296 | MiMo-V2-Flash none | Xiaomi | 2.9 | 4.0 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 19.7s |
| #58 | Muse Glimmer 30B xhigh | Meta | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.510 | 2/2 | 19.8s |
| #79 | Qwen3.7 Flash high | Qwen | 10.0 | 7.8 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 20.1s |
| #116 | Kimi K2.6 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.2 | $1.247 | 2/2 | 20.4s |
| #179 | Gemma 4 31B medium | 10.0 | 6.2 | $0.100 | 2/2 | 21.1s | |
| #199 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 3.7 | 6.0 | $0.118 | 0/2 | 21.4s |
| #222 | Owl Alpha medium | Openrouter | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 21.6s |