Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #207 | GPT-5.4 Mini none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.095 | 2/2 | 1.30s |
| #209 | GPT-5.4 none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 5.8 | $0.397 | 2/2 | 1.04s |
| #210 | Solar Pro 4 none | Upstage | 10.0 | 5.8 | $0.006 | 2/2 | 1.85s |
| #211 | North Mini Code medium | Cohere | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 24.1s |
| #212 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.050 | 2/2 | 18.2s |
| #213 | GLM 5 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.027 | 2/2 | 5.78s |
| #214 | Inkling Small low | Thinkingmachines | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.055 | 2/2 | 1.25s |
| #216 | GLM 5.1 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.164 | 2/2 | 1.08s |
| #217 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.233 | 2/2 | 1.32s |
| #218 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.283 | 2/2 | 1.01s |
| #219 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite high | 10.0 | 5.6 | $2.044 | 2/2 | 4.49s | |
| #221 | GLM 5V Turbo none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.052 | 2/2 | 3.81s |
| #222 | Owl Alpha medium | Openrouter | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.000 | 2/2 | 21.6s |
| #223 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.015 | 2/2 | 1.70s | |
| #224 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.6 | $0.045 | 2/2 | 1.39s |