Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
311/311
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #67 | GPT-5.2 Chat none | OpenAI | 10.0 | 7.9 | $0.594 | 2/2 | 3.05s |
| #161 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.621 | 2/2 | 1.44s | |
| #194 | Trinity Large Thinking low | Arcee AI | 7.3 | 6.0 | $0.625 | 1/2 | 14.3s |
| #53 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.644 | 2/2 | 4.06s | |
| #3 | Gemini 3.7 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.8 | $0.646 | 2/2 | 5.94s | |
| #159 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.646 | 2/2 | 3.00s | |
| #17 | Gemini 3.8 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.1 | $0.653 | 2/2 | 5.74s | |
| #44 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.655 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #108 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 none | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.661 | 2/2 | 3.43s |
| #21 | Gemini 3.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.0 | $0.665 | 2/2 | 4.07s | |
| #162 | Qwen3.6 35B A3B medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 6.6 | $0.672 | 2/2 | 13.0s |
| #51 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.3 | $0.673 | 2/2 | 3.22s |
| #204 | Mimo V2 Omni medium | Xiaomi | 10.0 | 5.9 | $0.683 | 2/2 | 3.04s |
| #102 | Kimi K2.7 Code medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.4 | $0.687 | 2/2 | 12.3s |
| #54 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.689 | 2/2 | 3.62s |