Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Response Time (avg) ↑.
343/343
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #47 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #175 | KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none | Kwaipilot | 10.0 | 6.7 | $0.487 | 2/2 | 5.07s |
| #74 | Grok 4.7 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $2.254 | 2/2 | 5.16s |
| #135 | DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 medium | DeepSeek | 10.0 | 7.3 | $0.216 | 2/2 | 5.21s |
| #191 | Hy3 preview medium | Tencent | 6.5 | 6.5 | $0.049 | 1/2 | 5.25s |
| #51 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #10 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 9.5 | $0.763 | 2/2 | 5.43s | |
| #303 | Grok 4.20 Multi Agent Beta medium | X AI | 10.0 | 4.8 | $5.599 | 2/2 | 5.54s |
| #106 | Nemotron 3 Ultra medium | NVIDIA | 10.0 | 7.6 | $0.567 | 2/2 | 5.68s |
| #22 | Gemini 3.8 Flash medium | 10.0 | 9.1 | $0.653 | 2/2 | 5.74s | |
| #240 | GLM 5 none | Z.ai | 10.0 | 5.7 | $0.027 | 2/2 | 5.78s |
| #79 | GLM 5.2 high | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.0 | $0.799 | 2/2 | 5.81s |
| #257 | Hy3 preview low | Tencent | 6.5 | 5.5 | $0.042 | 1/2 | 5.85s |
| #6 | Gemini 3.7 Flash high | 10.0 | 9.8 | $0.646 | 2/2 | 5.94s | |
| #43 | GLM 5.3 Flash max | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.117 | 2/2 | 6.10s |