Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Total Cost ↑.
451/451
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #423 | Command A+ high | Cohere | 0.3 | 0.3 | $0.079 | 0/2 | 86.2s |
| #288 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite minimal | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.080 | 2/2 | 1.04s | |
| #315 | Nemotron 3 Super medium | NVIDIA | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.081 | 2/2 | 18.2s |
| #158 | DeepSeek V4 Pro 0423 none | DeepSeek | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.083 | 2/2 | 4.61s |
| #237 | Laguna XS 2.1 medium | Poolside | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.083 | 2/2 | 4.50s |
| #411 | Grok 4.20 Beta default | X AI | 1.0 | 0.4 | $0.087 | 2/2 | 601ms |
| #92 | Claude Haiku 5.5 high | Anthropic | 1.0 | 0.8 | $0.088 | 2/2 | 3.77s |
| #53 | GLM 5.3 Flash max | Z.ai | 1.0 | 0.9 | $0.089 | 2/2 | 6.10s |
| #145 | Qwen3.8 27B low | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.8 | ~$0.089 | 2/2 | 8.03s |
| #210 | Qwen3.5-Flash none | Qwen | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.089 | 2/2 | 1.57s |
| #271 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.090 | 2/2 | 1.22s | |
| #349 | Laguna S 2.1 medium | Poolside | 1.0 | 0.5 | $0.092 | 2/2 | 2.42s |
| #241 | Solar Pro 4 medium | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.6 | $0.098 | 2/2 | 43.1s |
| #211 | Solar Pro 4 low | Upstage | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 2/2 | 62.4s |
| #160 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 1.0 | 0.7 | $0.101 | 2/2 | 16.5s |