Data parsing and extraction Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Data parsing and extraction, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
330/330
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Data parsing and extraction Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #41 | Claude Opus 5 low | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.121 | 2/2 | 3.69s |
| #42 | Gemini 3.6 Flash low | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.251 | 2/2 | 1.66s | |
| #43 | GLM 5.3 Flash max | Z.ai | 10.0 | 8.7 | $0.071 | 2/2 | 6.10s |
| #44 | Claude Opus 4.7 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.476 | 2/2 | 2.37s |
| #45 | Muse Spark 1.2 high | Meta | 10.0 | 8.7 | $1.771 | 2/2 | 6.93s |
| #46 | Muse Spark 1.2 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.339 | 2/2 | 6.42s |
| #47 | Muse Spark 1.1 medium | Meta | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.420 | 2/2 | 4.96s |
| #48 | Claude Fable 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.6 | $3.004 | 2/2 | 7.18s |
| #49 | Qwen3.6 Max Preview medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.6 | $1.132 | 2/2 | 41.2s |
| #50 | Qwen3.8 Max low | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.6 | $0.702 | 2/2 | 7.87s |
| #51 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 2/2 | 5.32s |
| #55 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 2/2 | 6.29s |
| #56 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.655 | 2/2 | 4.22s |
| #57 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 2/2 | 11.5s |
| #58 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 2/2 | 3.44s |