Combined Ranking
See which AI models perform best on Combined, which ones stay reliable, and where the biggest gaps appear. Sort by: Metric ↑.
220/220
Filter models
No models match the current search and filters.
| Rank | Model | Company | Combined Score | Score | Total Cost | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #174 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 30.9s |
| #175 | Mistral Small 4 medium | Mistral | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.096 | 0/2 | 32.4s |
| #176 | MiMo-V2.5 none | Xiaomi | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.025 | 0/2 | 28.9s |
| #177 | Qwen3.5-9B none | Qwen | 3.0 | 5.1 | $0.021 | 0/2 | 194.0s |
| #183 | GPT-4o-mini none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 5.0 | $0.010 | 0/2 | 6.32s |
| #185 | GLM 4.7 Flash none | Z.ai | 3.0 | 4.9 | $0.016 | 0/2 | 50.2s |
| #186 | Nemotron 3 Super none | NVIDIA | 3.0 | 4.9 | $0.008 | 0/2 | 18.2s |
| #187 | Ling-2.6-flash none | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 4.9 | $0.002 | 0/2 | 35.7s |
| #188 | Ring-2.6-1T none | Inclusionai | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.026 | 0/2 | 0ms |
| #189 | GPT-5.4 Nano none | OpenAI | 3.0 | 4.8 | $0.041 | 0/2 | 14.7s |
| #196 | Qwen3 Coder Next medium | Qwen | 3.0 | 4.7 | $0.032 | 0/2 | 14.6s |
| #198 | Mercury 2 none | Inception | 3.0 | 4.6 | $0.030 | 0/2 | 2.56s |
| #211 | Granite 4.1 8B none | IBM Granite | 3.0 | 4.0 | $0.007 | 0/2 | 9.28s |
| #214 | Qwen3.5-9B medium | Qwen | 3.0 | 3.8 | $0.036 | 0/2 | 0ms |
| #181 | Laguna S 2.1 low | Poolside | 3.2 | 5.0 | $0.091 | 0/2 | 412.5s |