Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

average score iko karibu sawa: 7.9 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.068 vs $0.267. GLM 5.2 (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 23.28s vs 51.51s, na pass rates 75.8% vs 80.3%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGLM 5.2 (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 3.9x less than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-18

Kipimo Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Toleo: 2026-06-03 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Toleo: 2026-06-17
Alama 7.9 7.8
Nafasi #36 #38
Uaminifu 10.0 9.5
Uthabiti 8.9 8.0
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 75.8% 80.3%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 3 4
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 63
Gharama kwa matokeo 2.072 2.159
Jumla ya gharama $0.267 $0.068
Bei ya ingizo $0.320 / 1M $0.293 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.280 / 1M $0.920 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 115,233 37,199
Tokeni za matokeo 6,162 12,261
Tokeni za hoja 173,267 49,500
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 51.51s 23.28s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 315.30s 101.36s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 1133.15s 488.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#36 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Gharama
$0.018
Muda
193.2s
Tokeni
10,821 tok

#38 GLM 5.2

medium
Gharama
$0.041
Muda
195.8s
Tokeni
9,287 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho