Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 6.9 vs 6.7. LongCat 2.0 (low) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.391 vs $0.738. Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 44.65s vs 100.31s, na pass rates 53.0% vs 68.2%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.6 Flash (medium)It has the best score here (6.9), while responding about 2.2x faster than LongCat 2.0 (low).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-21

Kipimo LongCat 2.0 LongCat 2.0 low Toleo: 2026-07-20 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Toleo: 2026-04-20
Alama 6.7 6.9
Nafasi #96 #89
Uaminifu 9.6 10.0
Uthabiti 8.9 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 53.0% 68.2%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 3 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 3.910 6.784
Jumla ya gharama $0.391 $0.738
Bei ya ingizo $0.300 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $1.200 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 90,909 129,041
Tokeni za matokeo 5,679 20,026
Tokeni za hoja 297,369 614,312
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 100.31s 44.65s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 560.39s 578.13s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 2206.82s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#96 LongCat 2.0

low
Gharama
$0.024
Muda
428.0s
Tokeni
19,557 tok

#89 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.008
Muda
29.9s
Tokeni
6,784 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
LongCat 2.0 6.6 4.6 77.8% 2 479.30s 6,544 461 206,627
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho