Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.6 Flash

Qwen3.6 Flash (medium) inaongoza kwa average score: 6.9 vs 6.7. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.476 vs $0.738. KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 ni ya haraka zaidi: 25.56s vs 44.65s, na pass rates 68.2% vs 68.2%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5Its score stays close to the best score here (6.7 vs 6.9), while costing about 1.6x less than Qwen3.6 Flash (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-17

Kipimo KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 none Toleo: 2026-07-14 Qwen3.6 Flash Qwen3.6 Flash medium Toleo: 2026-04-20
Alama 6.7 6.9
Nafasi #88 #82
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.4 8.2
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 68.2% 68.2%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 7 5
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 4.319 6.784
Jumla ya gharama $0.476 $0.738
Bei ya ingizo $0.740 / 1M $0.188 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.960 / 1M $1.125 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 98,499 129,041
Tokeni za matokeo 135,861 20,026
Tokeni za hoja 0 614,312
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 25.56s 44.65s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 335.41s 578.13s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 562.43s 982.32s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#88 KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5

none
Gharama
$0.010
Muda
29.0s
Tokeni
3,439 tok

#82 Qwen3.6 Flash

medium
SVG batili
Gharama
$0.008
Muda
29.9s
Tokeni
6,784 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5 6.1 4.7 66.7% 2 22.52s 7,893 22,440 0
Qwen3.6 Flash 5.0 5.1 44.5% 2 42.85s 7,895 495 67,967

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho