Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-27B

average score iko karibu sawa: 6.5 vs 6.5. Qwen3.5-27B ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.090 vs $0.369. Qwen3.5-27B ni ya haraka zaidi: 4.76s vs 6.01s, na pass rates 69.7% vs 40.9%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaQwen3.5-27BIt has the best score here (6.5), while costing about 4.1x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-21

Kipimo Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite medium Toleo: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B none Toleo: 2026-02-24
Alama 6.5 6.5
Nafasi #104 #109
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.4 9.3
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 69.7% 40.9%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 7 2
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 3.074 0.763
Jumla ya gharama $0.369 $0.090
Bei ya ingizo $0.300 / 1M $0.260 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.500 / 1M $2.600 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 118,818 102,316
Tokeni za matokeo 11,677 24,321
Tokeni za hoja 121,611 0
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 6.01s 4.76s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 49.03s 69.46s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 132.30s 104.71s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#104 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

medium
Gharama
$0.015
Muda
16.4s
Tokeni
5,971 tok

#109 Qwen3.5-27B

none
Gharama
$0.007
Muda
42.9s
Tokeni
4,273 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 5.5 7.4 44.4% 1 8.37s 8,136 452 25,999
Qwen3.5-27B 5.8 10.0 33.3% 0 1.80s 7,913 415 0

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho