Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite vs Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus

Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) inaongoza kwa average score: 8.1 vs 7.9. Qwen3.7 Plus (medium) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $0.267 vs $0.584. Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high) ni ya haraka zaidi: 9.48s vs 51.51s, na pass rates 81.8% vs 75.8%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGemini 3.5 Flash-Lite (high)It has the best score here (8.1), while responding about 5.4x faster than Qwen3.7 Plus (medium).

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-21

Kipimo Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite high Toleo: 2026-07-21 Qwen3.7 Plus Qwen3.7 Plus medium Toleo: 2026-06-03
Alama 8.1 7.9
Nafasi #31 #40
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 7.5 8.9
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 81.8% 75.8%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 7 3
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 4.169 2.072
Jumla ya gharama $0.584 $0.267
Bei ya ingizo $0.300 / 1M $0.320 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $2.500 / 1M $1.280 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 105,138 115,233
Tokeni za matokeo 8,315 6,162
Tokeni za hoja 212,507 173,267
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 9.48s 51.51s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 43.93s 315.30s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 208.52s 1133.15s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#31 Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite

high
Gharama
$0.023
Muda
23.6s
Tokeni
9,128 tok

#40 Qwen3.7 Plus

medium
Gharama
$0.018
Muda
193.2s
Tokeni
10,821 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite 8.6 7.6 88.9% 1 15.09s 8,136 452 55,603
Qwen3.7 Plus 6.1 6.6 55.6% 1 108.60s 6,472 414 43,576

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho