Urambazaji
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Anthropic: Claude Opus 4.7 vs OpenAI: GPT-5.5

GPT-5.5 (low) inaongoza kwa average score: 9.3 vs 8.7. GPT-5.5 (low) ina gharama ya chini ya benchmark: $1.253 vs $1.477. Claude Opus 4.7 (medium) ni ya haraka zaidi: 7.61s vs 10.13s, na pass rates 83.3% vs 86.4%.

Muundo unaopendekezwaGPT-5.5 (low)It has the strongest score in this comparison (9.3) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Benchmark zimetengenezwa kutoka seti za majaribio za AI BENCHY tarehe: 2026-07-25

Kipimo Claude Opus 4.7 Claude Opus 4.7 medium Toleo: 2026-04-16 GPT-5.5 GPT-5.5 low Toleo: 2026-04-24
Alama 8.7 9.3
Nafasi #20 #9
Uaminifu 10.0 10.0
Uthabiti 9.6 10.0
Majaribio sahihi
Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio 83.3% 86.4%
Majaribio yasiyo thabiti 1 0
Jumla ya uendeshaji 66 66
Gharama kwa matokeo 8.201 6.594
Jumla ya gharama $1.477 $1.253
Bei ya ingizo $5.000 / 1M $5.000 / 1M
Bei ya toleo $25.000 / 1M $30.000 / 1M
Jumla ya tokeni za ingizo 145,252 80,058
Tokeni za matokeo 24,948 5,378
Tokeni za hoja 5,042 23,040
Muda wa majibu (wastani) 7.61s 10.13s
Muda wa majibu (upeo) 65.40s 56.19s
Muda wa majibu (jumla) 159.91s 222.82s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#20 Claude Opus 4.7

medium
Gharama
$0.059
Muda
26.8s
Tokeni
2,475 tok

#9 GPT-5.5

low
Gharama
$0.068
Muda
37.0s
Tokeni
2,339 tok

Modeli bora kwa alama

Alama dhidi ya gharama ya jumla

Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Alama vs Muda wa majibu (wastani)

Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Alama vs Jumla ya tokeni za matokeo

Mgawanyo wa kategoria

Uandishi wa msimbo Alama Uthabiti Kiwango cha kupita kwa kila jaribio Majaribio yasiyo thabiti Majaribio sahihi Muda wa majibu (wastani) Tokeni za ingizo Tokeni za matokeo Tokeni za hoja
Claude Opus 4.7 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 12.96s 10,635 7,629 1,114
GPT-5.5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.04s 7,302 423 6,402

Ulinganisho wa haraka

Badilisha jozi ya ulinganisho