AI BENCHY
Compară Grafice Metodologie
❤️ Made by XCS
Your ad here

Categorie AI BENCHY

Clasament Apelare instrumente

Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Apelare instrumente, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Teste corecte ↓.

Modele afișate

55

Media pentru Scor Apelare instrumente

10.0

Rang Model Companie Scor Apelare instrumente Scor mediu Teste corecte Timp de răspuns (mediu)
#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium Google 10.0 10.0 1/1 10.6s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 10.0 9.4 1/1 23.1s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 10.0 8.4 1/1 6.37s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 10.0 8.3 1/1 7.54s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 4.99s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 12.0s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 10.0 8.2 1/1 7.45s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 10.0 8.2 1/1 7.73s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 10.0 8.0 1/1 13.3s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 10.0 7.7 1/1 4.60s
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 7.7 1/1 7.48s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 10.0 7.5 1/1 3.80s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 10.0 7.4 1/1 11.9s
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 10.0 7.4 1/1 15.9s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.4 1/1 4.68s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 10.0 7.4 1/1 6.20s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 10.0 7.3 1/1 9.54s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 10.0 7.3 1/1 34.8s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 10.0 7.3 1/1 8.36s
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 10.0 7.2 1/1 3.35s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 10.0 7.2 1/1 27.8s
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 10.0 7.1 1/1 3.39s
#23 Seed-2.0-Mini medium Bytedance Seed 10.0 6.9 1/1 88.7s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 10.0 6.9 1/1 10.3s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 10.0 6.8 1/1 4.11s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 10.0 6.6 1/1 9.73s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 10.0 6.4 1/1 31.7s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 10.0 6.2 1/1 3.33s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 10.0 6.0 1/1 11.1s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 10.0 6.0 1/1 18.6s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 10.0 5.5 1/1 11.8s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 10.0 5.5 1/1 33.3s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 10.0 5.5 1/1 4.65s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 10.0 5.3 1/1 1.89s
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 10.0 5.2 1/1 3.67s
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 10.0 5.2 1/1 1.91s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 9.0 5.1 1/1 6.91s
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 10.0 5.0 1/1 2.04s
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 10.0 4.9 1/1 3.54s
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 10.0 4.7 1/1 2.30s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 10.0 4.7 1/1 15.4s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 10.0 4.5 1/1 2.75s
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 10.0 4.2 1/1 6.67s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 10.0 4.1 1/1 14.0s
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 10.0 4.0 1/1 2.51s
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 10.0 4.0 1/1 2.47s
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 10.0 3.5 1/1 2.64s
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 10.0 3.4 1/1 1.27s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 10.0 3.1 1/1 15.9s
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 10.0 2.9 1/1 2.28s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 10.0 6.5 0/1 10.3s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 10.0 6.2 0/1 27.7s
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 10.0 3.9 0/1 7.05s
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 10.0 2.9 0/1 5.51s
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 10.0 2.6 0/1 0ms

Top modele după Scor Apelare instrumente

Scor Apelare instrumente vs cost total

Top modele după Timp de răspuns (mediu)