Clasament Apelare instrumente
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Apelare instrumente, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Teste corecte ↓.
316/316
Filtrează modelele
Niciun model nu corespunde căutării și filtrelor curente.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Apelare instrumente | Scor | Cost total | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #46 | Qwen3.8 Max low | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.6 | $0.702 | 1/1 | 8.06s |
| #47 | GPT-5.4 medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $1.560 | 1/1 | 13.3s |
| #48 | Grok 4.5 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.5 | $2.042 | 1/1 | 6.57s |
| #49 | Muse Spark 1.2 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.655 | 1/1 | 3.58s |
| #50 | Grok 4.6 medium | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.713 | 1/1 | 12.8s |
| #51 | Grok 4.5 low | X AI | 10.0 | 8.4 | $0.945 | 1/1 | 5.83s |
| #53 | Qwen3.8 27B high | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.4 | ~$0.287 | 1/1 | 5.62s |
| #54 | Seed 2.1 Turbo medium | Bytedance Seed | 10.0 | 8.4 | $1.951 | 1/1 | 27.5s |
| #56 | Muse Spark 1.1 low | Meta | 9.8 | 8.3 | $0.673 | 1/1 | 5.98s |
| #57 | Claude Fable 5.1 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.3 | $2.909 | 1/1 | 13.0s |
| #58 | Gemini 2.5 Flash medium | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.644 | 1/1 | 6.20s | |
| #59 | Muse Spark 1.3 low | Meta | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.689 | 1/1 | 7.39s |
| #60 | Claude Sonnet 5 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.2 | $0.922 | 1/1 | 10.7s |
| #61 | Qwen3.8 2.4T A95B low | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.1 | $2.672 | 1/1 | 25.9s |
| #62 | GPT-5 Mini medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 8.1 | $0.241 | 1/1 | 18.6s |