Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Specific domeniului
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Specific domeniului, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↑.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Specific domeniului | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #91 | GPT-5.5 none | OpenAI | 2.9 | 6.4 | 0/3 | 1.31s |
| #110 | Seed-2.0-Lite none | Bytedance Seed | 3.6 | 5.8 | 0/3 | 1.33s |
| #124 | Kimi K2.6 none | Moonshot AI | 5.3 | 5.5 | 1/3 | 1.48s |
| #61 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite low | 5.3 | 7.2 | 1/3 | 1.52s | |
| #68 | Claude Opus 4.8 none | Anthropic | 5.3 | 7.0 | 1/3 | 1.66s |
| #120 | Mimo V2 PRO none | Xiaomi | 5.3 | 5.6 | 1/3 | 1.78s |
| #134 | GLM 5 Turbo none | Z.ai | 5.3 | 5.2 | 1/3 | 1.97s |
| #112 | GLM 5.1 none | Z.ai | 2.9 | 5.7 | 0/3 | 1.99s |
| #109 | GLM 5V Turbo none | Z.ai | 5.3 | 5.8 | 1/3 | 2.09s |
| #101 | Mimo V2 Omni none | Xiaomi | 5.3 | 6.0 | 1/3 | 2.10s |
| #98 | GLM 5 none | Z.ai | 3.0 | 6.1 | 0/3 | 2.24s |
| #116 | Hunter Alpha none | OpenRouter | 5.3 | 5.7 | 1/3 | 2.33s |
| #50 | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low | 5.3 | 7.4 | 1/3 | 2.36s | |
| #102 | Gemma 4 26B A4B none | 3.6 | 6.0 | 0/3 | 2.49s | |
| #121 | Owl Alpha none | Openrouter | 5.3 | 5.5 | 1/3 | 3.00s |