Categorie AI BENCHY
Clasament Combinat
Vezi ce modele AI se descurcă cel mai bine la Combinat, care rămân fiabile și unde apar cele mai mari diferențe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↑.
| Rang | Model | Companie | Scor Combinat | Scor | Teste corecte | Timp de răspuns (mediu) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| #87 | Qwen3 Coder Next none | Qwen | 3.0 | 5.1 | 0/1 | 45.1s |
| #70 | Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none | Qwen | 3.0 | 5.7 | 0/1 | 46.0s |
| #26 | Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 8.0 | 1/1 | 46.4s |
| #8 | Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium | Qwen | 10.0 | 8.5 | 1/1 | 46.8s |
| #63 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none | Qwen | 3.0 | 6.1 | 0/1 | 47.4s |
| #1 | Gemini 3 Flash Preview medium | 10.0 | 10.0 | 1/1 | 50.2s | |
| #71 | MiniMax M2.5 medium | Minimax | 4.5 | 5.7 | 0/1 | 60.4s |
| #23 | MiMo-V2-Pro medium | Xiaomi | 4.7 | 8.1 | 0/1 | 64.7s |
| #93 | GLM 4.7 Flash medium | Z.ai | 2.8 | 4.6 | 0/1 | 65.6s |
| #57 | GPT-5 Nano medium | OpenAI | 10.0 | 6.3 | 1/1 | 66.0s |
| #46 | Kimi K2.5 medium | Moonshot AI | 10.0 | 7.0 | 1/1 | 71.4s |
| #24 | Gemma 4 26B A4B medium | 9.6 | 8.0 | 1/1 | 73.5s | |
| #43 | Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium | Qwen | 4.7 | 7.4 | 0/1 | 75.3s |
| #41 | MiMo-V2-Flash medium | Xiaomi | 9.8 | 7.5 | 1/1 | 75.7s |
| #37 | Claude Opus 4.6 medium | Anthropic | 10.0 | 7.6 | 1/1 | 76.7s |