AI BENCHY
Compară Grafice Metodologie
❤️ Made by XCS
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Eșecuri pe categorii AI BENCHY

Specific domeniului
Răspuns greșit

Vezi ce modele AI au cele mai mari șanse să întâmpine Răspuns greșit la Specific domeniului, ca să găsești mai repede punctele slabe. Sortează după: Timp de răspuns (mediu) ↑.

Modele afișate

53

Eșecuri totale

98

Modelul cel mai afectat

Claude Sonnet 4.6 1
Rang Model Companie Număr de Răspuns greșit Scor de categorie Teste corecte Timp de răspuns (mediu)
#11 Claude Sonnet 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 0ms
#14 GLM 5 medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 0ms
#55 LFM2-24B-A2B none Liquid 1 4.0 1/3 287ms
#40 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 465ms
#42 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 485ms
#38 Gemini 2.5 Flash none Google 2 4.0 1/3 495ms
#51 Mercury 2 none Inception 2 4.0 1/3 534ms
#41 Qwen3.5-27B none Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 540ms
#54 MiMo-V2-Flash none Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 564ms
#47 GPT-4o-mini none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 637ms
#50 Qwen3 Coder Next medium Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 638ms
#49 GLM 4.7 Flash none Z.ai 1 7.0 2/3 744ms
#45 Trinity Large Preview none Arcee AI 2 4.0 1/3 877ms
#37 Qwen3.5-Flash none Qwen 1 7.0 2/3 905ms
#22 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview none Google 2 4.0 1/3 942ms
#48 Qwen3 Coder Next none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 962ms
#20 Gemini 3 Flash Preview none Google 1 7.0 2/3 963ms
#53 Grok 4.1 Fast none X AI 2 4.0 1/3 1.06s
#44 GPT-5.4 none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 1.07s
#29 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 none Qwen 2 4.0 1/3 1.17s
#33 DeepSeek V3.2 none DeepSeek 3 10.0 0/3 1.61s
#31 GLM 5 none Z.ai 3 10.0 0/3 2.24s
#17 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 2.36s
#25 Claude Sonnet 4.6 none Anthropic 1 7.0 2/3 3.54s
#12 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium Google 3 10.0 0/3 4.21s
#46 Kimi K2.5 none Moonshot AI 2 4.0 1/3 4.38s
#36 Mercury 2 medium Inception 3 10.0 0/3 6.48s
#6 Gemini 3 Pro Preview medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 7.01s
#5 Gemini 3 Flash Preview low Google 2 4.0 1/3 8.05s
#19 GPT-5.3 Chat none OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 13.0s
#4 Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15 medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 17.5s
#15 GPT-5.2 Chat none OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 17.8s
#2 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Google 1 7.0 2/3 32.7s
#16 Gemini 2.5 Flash medium Google 2 4.0 1/3 37.3s
#18 DeepSeek V3.2 medium DeepSeek 1 4.0 1/3 39.3s
#32 GPT-5 Mini medium OpenAI 2 10.0 0/3 44.6s
#39 gpt-oss-120b medium OpenAI 3 10.0 0/3 50.9s
#10 Qwen3.5-122B-A10B medium Qwen 3 10.0 0/3 63.4s
#3 GPT-5.3-Codex medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 64.3s
#9 GPT-5.4 medium OpenAI 2 4.0 1/3 74.3s
#27 GPT-5.2 medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 77.8s
#7 Qwen3.5-27B medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 79.5s
#26 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Anthropic 1 10.0 0/3 83.4s
#35 Qwen3.5-35B-A3B medium Qwen 1 10.0 0/3 88.3s
#21 MiMo-V2-Flash medium Xiaomi 2 4.0 1/3 96.0s
#30 Grok 4.1 Fast medium X AI 1 4.0 1/3 121.8s
#8 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview high Google 2 4.0 1/3 127.6s
#28 Kimi K2.5 medium Moonshot AI 2 10.0 0/3 137.3s
#24 Qwen3.5-Flash medium Qwen 1 4.0 1/3 146.5s
#13 Step 3.5 Flash medium Stepfun 2 4.0 1/3 170.5s
#52 GLM 4.7 Flash medium Z.ai 2 10.0 0/3 174.6s
#34 GPT-5 Nano medium OpenAI 1 4.0 1/3 204.0s
#43 MiniMax M2.5 medium Minimax 2 10.0 0/3 237.3s

Top modele după Număr de Răspuns greșit

Număr de Răspuns greșit vs scor mediu

Top modele după Timp de răspuns (mediu)

Top modele după Cost irosit estimat