#19 GLM 5 Turbo
medium- Cost
- $0.074
- Time
- 206.0s
- Tokens
- 18,549 tok
Z.ai
Release: 2026-03-15
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:19
z-ai/glm-5-turbo::medium
744B total (40B active)MoEClosed
(medium)
(none)
Summary
GLM 5 Turbo scores 8.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #19. It has N/A reliability, a 77.8% pass rate, $0.182 total cost, and 17.67s average response time.
Archived model: this model is no longer updated or tested on new tests.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- 744B total (40B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Family size is reported; exact API snapshot is closed.
8.1
Consistency
8.0
N/A
$0.182
Total Output Tokens
51,130
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$1.200 / 1M
Output Price
$4.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
5
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-06-04 13:06 Re-test | 7.6 | 10.0 | $0.323 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:06 Re-test | 7.6 | 10.0 | $0.323 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:06 New test added | 8.0 | 10.0 | $0.323 ↑ | Compare | |
| 2026-05-21 23:44 Suite changed | 7.9 | 8.3 | $0.244 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:19 First recorded run | 8.1 | N/A | $0.182 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:19 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 8.1 | 8.0 | N/A | 12/18 | 5 | 51,130 | 0 | $0.182 | 17.67s |
| 2026-05-21 23:44 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 7.9 | 8.1 | 8.3 | 13/20 | 5 | 65,789 | 0 | $0.244 | 22.69s |
| Difference | — | +0.3 | -0.1 | -1 | 0 | -14659 | 0 | -$0.063 | -5021ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 2.9 | 4.4 | |
| General Intelligence | 6.1 | 3.1 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.3 | 5.8 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |