Advertise here
#78

Hunter Alpha

OpenRouter Release: 2026-03-11 Tested on: 2026-04-11 00:35 openrouter/hunter-alpha::none
~1T total (~42B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium) (none)

Summary

Hunter Alpha scores 5.7 on AI BENCHY and ranks #78. It has N/A reliability, a 46.3% pass rate, $0.000 total cost, and 4.58s average response time.

What makes Hunter Alpha unique: Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.

Archived model: this model is no longer updated or tested on new tests.

Identity note

Hunter Alpha was the stealth version of Xiaomi: MiMo-V2-Pro.

Model facts

Researched on 2026-08-12

Estimated
Parameters
~1T total (~42B active)
Architecture
MoE
Availability
Closed
License
-

Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Existing relation identifies Hunter Alpha as MiMo V2 Pro.

Score

5.7

Consistency

8.2

Reliability

N/A

Total Output Tokens

2,278

Total Input Tokens

0

Input Price

$0.000 / 1M

Output Price

$0.000 / 1M

Tests Correct

Wrong Tests: 12

Attempt pass rate: 46.3%

Flaky tests

4

Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).

Response Time (avg)

4.58s

Response Time (max): 15.17s

Response Time (total): 77.92s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#78 Hunter Alpha

none
Hunter Alpha was a stealth model revealed on March 18th as an early testing version of MiMo-V2-Pro. Find it here: https://openrouter.ai/xiaomi/mimo-v2-pro
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Run history

Tested on Score Reliability Tests Correct Total Cost Compare
2026-05-06 14:09 Re-test 4.2 N/A $0.000 Compare
2026-05-06 14:09 Re-test 4.2 N/A $0.000 Compare
2026-05-06 14:09 Re-test 5.7 N/A $0.000 Compare
2026-05-06 14:09 Re-test 5.7 N/A $0.000 Compare
2026-05-06 14:09 Re-test 5.7 N/A $0.000 Compare
2026-05-06 14:09 Suite changed 5.7 N/A $0.000 Compare
2026-04-11 00:35 First recorded run 5.7 N/A $0.000 Current run

Run comparison

RunBenchmark coverageScoreConsistencyReliabilityTests CorrectFlaky testsTotal Output TokensTotal Input TokensTotal CostResponse Time (avg)
2026-04-11 00:35 · First recorded run52/54 attempts5.78.2N/A6/1842,2780$0.0004.58s
2026-05-06 14:09 · Suite changed52/54 attempts5.78.2N/A6/1842,2780$0.0004.58s
Difference0.00.00000$0.0000ms

These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.

Charts

Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Category Score Consistency Tests Correct
Anti-AI Tricks 3.5 8.0
Coding 3.0 10.0
Combined 3.0 10.0
Data parsing and extraction 10.0 10.0
Domain specific 5.3 10.0
General Intelligence 6.1 3.1
Instructions following 6.4 10.0
Puzzle Solving 5.8 4.4
Tool Calling 10.0 10.0

Compared models