#44 GPT-5.2 Chat
none- Cost
- $0.010
- Time
- 15.3s
- Tokens
- 797 tok
OpenAI
Release: 2025-12-11
Tested on: 2026-05-22 00:19
openai/gpt-5.2-chat::none
~400B total (~17B active)MoEClosedEstimated Summary
GPT-5.2 Chat scores 7.6 on AI BENCHY and ranks #44. It has 10.0 reliability, a 71.7% pass rate, $0.355 total cost, and 6.86s average response time.
What makes GPT-5.2 Chat unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #4, while Instructions following is its weakest area at #17. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~400B total (~17B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Vendor does not disclose the architecture or count.
7.6
Consistency
8.5
10.0
$0.355
Total Output Tokens
21,371
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$1.750 / 1M
Output Price
$14.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
4
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:24 Re-test | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.594 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:40 New test added | 8.0 | 10.0 | $0.604 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:47 New test added | 7.9 | 10.0 | $0.393 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:19 Suite changed | 7.6 | 10.0 | $0.355 | Current run | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 7.9 | N/A | $0.291 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-22 00:19 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 7.6 | 8.5 | 10.0 | 12/20 | 4 | 21,371 | 0 | $0.355 | 6.86s |
| 2026-07-16 22:40 · New test added | 66/66 attempts | 8.0 | 8.6 | 10.0 | 14/22 | 4 | 30,424 | 101,248 | $0.604 | 7.65s |
| Difference | — | -0.4 | -0.1 | 0.0 | -2 | 0 | -9053 | -101248 | -$0.249 | -795ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
GPT-5.2 ChatnonevsKimi K3maxGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsStep 3.7 FlashmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGPT-5.6 TerrahighGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.8 27BlowGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsInklingmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.7 PlusmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGLM 5.2highGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsQwen3.6 PlusmediumGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731highGPT-5.2 ChatnonevsGemini 3.5 Flash Litemedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.7 | 7.9 | |
| Coding | 8.2 | 6.7 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.4 | 3.0 | |
| Instructions following | 7.3 | 5.9 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Trivia | 3.0 | 10.0 |