#23 Gemini 3 Flash Preview
none- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 5.6s
- Tokens
- 981 tok
Google
Release: 2025-12-17
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:44
google/gemini-3-flash-preview::none
~500B total (~20B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores 8.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #23. It has N/A reliability, a 77.8% pass rate, $0.021 total cost, and 1.65s average response time.
What makes Gemini 3 Flash Preview unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #1, while Combined is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~500B total (~20B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Sparse MoE is documented for the family; counts are estimated.
8.1
Consistency
9.1
N/A
$0.021
Total Output Tokens
1,840
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.500 / 1M
Output Price
$3.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
2
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:39 Re-test | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.085 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:49 New test added | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.085 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:56 New test added | 7.4 | 10.0 | $0.025 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:23 Suite changed | 7.7 | 10.0 | $0.023 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 8.1 | N/A | $0.021 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 8.1 | 9.1 | N/A | 13/18 | 2 | 1,840 | 0 | $0.021 | 1.65s |
| 2026-06-04 13:56 · New test added | 63/63 attempts | 7.4 | 9.2 | 10.0 | 13/21 | 2 | 1,885 | 37,011 | $0.025 | 1.65s |
| Difference | — | +0.7 | -0.1 | 0 | 0 | -45 | -37011 | -$0.004 | +7ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 63/63 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsMiMo-V2.5-PromediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsGemma 4 26B A4BmediumFree AvailableGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsDeepSeek V4 PrononeGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsGLM 5.2noneGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsSolar Pro 4mediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5noneGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsSolar Pro 4lowGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsLongCat 2.0lowGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsSeed-2.0-CodemediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewnonevsGemini 3.5 Flashminimal
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 4.7 | 1.6 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 6.4 | 5.8 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |