#1 Gemini 3 Flash Preview
medium- Cost
- $0.010
- Time
- 18.4s
- Tokens
- 3,351 tok
Google
Release: 2025-12-17
Tested on: 2026-05-06 13:52
google/gemini-3-flash-preview::medium
~500B total (~20B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Gemini 3 Flash Preview scores 10.0 on AI BENCHY and ranks #1. It has 10.0 reliability, a 100.0% pass rate, $0.321 total cost, and 11.76s average response time.
What makes Gemini 3 Flash Preview unique: It is one of the highest-ranked models overall.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~500B total (~20B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Sparse MoE is documented for the family; counts are estimated.
10.0
Consistency
10.0
10.0
$0.321
Total Output Tokens
101,771
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.500 / 1M
Output Price
$3.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
0
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:41 Re-test | 9.5 | 10.0 | $0.763 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:51 New test added | 9.6 | 10.0 | $0.742 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:59 New test added | 9.8 | 10.0 | $0.667 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:28 Suite changed | 9.8 | 10.0 | $0.567 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-06 13:52 Suite changed | 10.0 | 10.0 | $0.321 | Current run | |
| 2026-05-06 13:38 Suite changed | 9.8 | 10.0 | $0.320 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-23 15:25 Re-test | 10.0 | N/A | $0.108 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 10.0 | N/A | $0.314 | Compare |
This run used a different benchmark suite. Keep suite changes in mind when reading historical movement.
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-05-06 13:52 · Suite changed | 54/54 attempts | 10.0 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 18/18 | 0 | 101,771 | 0 | $0.321 | 11.76s |
| 2026-04-23 15:25 · Re-test | 18/54 attempts | 10.0 | 10.0 | N/A | 18/18 | 0 | 34,404 | 0 | $0.108 | 12.11s |
| Difference | — | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | +67367 | 0 | +$0.213 | -352ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 18/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 SollowGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGemini 3.5 FlashhighGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGemini 3.6 FlashmediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGemini 3.7 FlashmediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGemini 3.7 FlashhighGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 SolmediumGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGemini 3.6 FlashhighGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 SolhighGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowGemini 3 Flash PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6high
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |