#24 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
low- Cost
- $0.002
- Time
- 3.7s
- Tokens
- 1,203 tok
Google
Release: 2026-03-03
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:44
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite-preview::low
~150B total (~10B active)MoEClosedEstimated
Summary
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview scores 8.1 on AI BENCHY and ranks #24. It has N/A reliability, a 72.2% pass rate, $0.022 total cost, and 3.22s average response time.
What makes Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #4, while Combined is its weakest area at #18. Its total benchmark cost is unusually low for its score range. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Identity note
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview was the preview version of Google: Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~150B total (~10B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Google does not disclose parameter counts.
8.1
Consistency
10.0
N/A
$0.022
Total Output Tokens
10,305
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$0.250 / 1M
Output Price
$1.500 / 1M
Flaky tests
0
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:44 Re-test | 6.6 | 10.0 | $0.646 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 23:07 New test added | 6.5 | 10.0 | $0.646 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 14:00 New test added | 7.4 | 10.0 | $0.026 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:27 Suite changed | 7.6 | 10.0 | $0.025 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 8.1 | N/A | $0.022 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 8.1 | 10.0 | N/A | 13/18 | 0 | 10,305 | 0 | $0.022 | 3.22s |
| 2026-05-22 00:27 · Suite changed | 60/60 attempts | 7.6 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 13/20 | 0 | 11,109 | 0 | $0.025 | 3.01s |
| Difference | — | +0.5 | 0.0 | 0 | 0 | -804 | 0 | -$0.003 | +208ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 60/60 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.5-27BnoneGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsInkling SmallmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsGemini 3.5 Flash LitelowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsGemini 3.1 Flash LitelowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsLongCat 2.0highGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsGemini 3.5 FlashminimalGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.5 Plus 2026-02-15noneGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsLongCat 2.0lowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewlowvsQwen3.6 27Bmedium
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 8.3 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 3.0 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 5.3 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 4.0 | 10.0 | |
| Instructions following | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |