#47 Claude Sonnet 4.6
none- Cost
- $0.038
- Time
- 27.3s
- Tokens
- 2,598 tok
Anthropic
Release: 2026-02-17
Tested on: 2026-04-11 01:44
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6::none
~1T total (~100B active)MoEClosedEstimated
(medium)
(none)
Summary
Claude Sonnet 4.6 scores 7.4 on AI BENCHY and ranks #47. It has N/A reliability, a 64.8% pass rate, $0.262 total cost, and 4.98s average response time.
What makes Claude Sonnet 4.6 unique: It stands out most in Domain specific, where it ranks #1, while Anti-AI Tricks is its weakest area at #18. It is notably fast compared with similar models.
Model facts
Researched on 2026-08-12
- Parameters
- ~1T total (~100B active)
- Architecture
- MoE
- Availability
- Closed
- License
- -
Best estimate from public evidence; the vendor did not disclose every value. Vendor does not disclose parameter counts.
7.4
Consistency
9.6
N/A
$0.262
Total Output Tokens
7,433
Total Input Tokens
0
Input Price
$3.000 / 1M
Output Price
$15.000 / 1M
Flaky tests
1
Flaky tests had mixed outcomes across runs (at least one pass and one fail).
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
Run history
| Tested on | Score | Reliability | Tests Correct | Total Cost | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-08-14 02:00 Re-test | 7.3 | 10.0 | $0.661 | Compare | |
| 2026-07-16 22:21 New test added | 7.3 | 10.0 | $0.661 | Compare | |
| 2026-06-04 13:40 New test added | 6.8 | 10.0 | $0.316 | Compare | |
| 2026-05-22 00:12 Suite changed | 7.0 | 10.0 | $0.306 | Compare | |
| 2026-04-11 01:44 First recorded run | 7.4 | N/A | $0.262 | Current run |
Run comparison
| Run | Benchmark coverage | Score | Consistency | Reliability | Tests Correct | Flaky tests | Total Output Tokens | Total Input Tokens | Total Cost | Response Time (avg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-04-11 01:44 · First recorded run | 54/54 attempts | 7.4 | 9.6 | N/A | 11/18 | 1 | 7,433 | 0 | $0.262 | 4.98s |
| 2026-08-14 02:00 · Re-test | 66/66 attempts | 7.3 | 9.7 | 10.0 | 12/22 | 1 | 19,362 | 123,273 | $0.661 | 7.67s |
| Difference | — | +0.1 | -0.1 | -1 | 0 | -11929 | -123273 | -$0.399 | -2689ms |
Benchmark coverage differs: 54/54 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test) versus 66/66 attempts (Target: 3 repeats per test). Totals and repeat-sensitive metrics are not directly comparable.
These two runs used different benchmark suites, so the deltas reflect both model changes and suite changes.
Charts
Choose the first model, then click a second model to open a side-by-side page.
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Quick Compare
Claude Sonnet 4.6nonevsGemini 3 Flash PreviewlowClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5lowClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsGrok 4.6lowClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsGemini 3.1 Flash LitemediumClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsQwen3.7 PlusnoneClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsLongCat 2.0mediumClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0731mediumClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsGPT-5.6 LunamediumClaude Sonnet 4.6nonevsClaude Opus 4.8none
Category Breakdown
| Category | Score | Consistency | Tests Correct |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anti-AI Tricks | 4.8 | 10.0 | |
| Coding | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Combined | 9.5 | 10.0 | |
| Data parsing and extraction | 10.0 | 10.0 | |
| Domain specific | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| General Intelligence | 6.1 | 3.1 | |
| Instructions following | 6.5 | 10.0 | |
| Puzzle Solving | 7.7 | 10.0 | |
| Tool Calling | 10.0 | 10.0 |