Navigasi
Advertise here

Granite 4.2 8B (low) vs Ling-2.6-1T

Ling-2.6-1T unggul dalam skor rata-rata dengan 5.3 vs 5.1. Granite 4.2 8B (low) memiliki biaya benchmark lebih rendah di $0.012 vs $0.016. Ling-2.6-1T lebih cepat di 8.59s vs 54.36s, dengan tingkat keberhasilan 31.8% vs 18.2%.

Benchmark dihasilkan dari suite pengujian AI BENCHY pada: 2026-09-10

Model yang Dibandingkan

Peringkat
#268
Total token output
27,928
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
54.36s
Total Biaya
$0.012
Peringkat
#259
Total token output
11,555
Waktu respons (rata-rata)
8.59s
Total Biaya
$0.016
Model yang direkomendasikan Ling-2.6-1T

It has the best score here (5.3), while responding about 6.3x faster than Granite 4.2 8B (low).

Perbandingan terperinci

Metrik Granite 4.2 8B Granite 4.2 8B low Rilis: 2026-09-02 Ling-2.6-1T Ling-2.6-1T none Rilis: 2026-04-23
Skor 5.1 5.3
Peringkat #268 #259
Keandalan 9.0 10.0
Konsistensi 10.0 10.0
Percobaan 66/66 66/66
Tes benar
Tingkat lulus per percobaan 31.8% 18.2%
Tes tidak stabil 0 0
Total Run 66 66
Biaya per hasil 0.167 0.278
Total Biaya $0.012 $0.016
Harga input $0.060 / 1M $0.075 / 1M
Harga output $0.250 / 1M $0.625 / 1M
Total token input 74,721 106,423
Token output 9,205 11,555
Token penalaran 18,723 0
Waktu respons (rata-rata) 54.36s 8.59s
Waktu respons (maks) 566.80s 25.72s
Waktu respons (total) 1195.97s 163.20s
Parameter 8B 1T total (63B aktif)
Ketersediaan Sumber terbuka Sumber terbuka

Showcase generasi model

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#268 IBM: Granite 4.2 8B

low
Provider returned error
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.2s
Token
0 tok

#259 Ling-2.6-1T

none
Ling-2.6-1T is no longer available as a free model. It has transitioned to a paid model. Continue using it here: https://openrouter.ai/inclusionai/ling-2.6-1t
Biaya
$0.000
Waktu
0.1s
Token
0 tok

Model teratas berdasarkan skor

Skor vs Total Biaya

Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Skor vs Waktu respons (rata-rata)

Total token output

Skor vs Total token output

Rincian Kategori

Pemrograman Skor Konsistensi Tingkat lulus per percobaan Tes tidak stabil Tes benar Waktu respons (rata-rata) Token input Token output Token penalaran
Granite 4.2 8B 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 13.01s 8,439 2,469 2,984
Ling-2.6-1T 3.8 10.0 0.0% 0 10.57s 813 381 0

Perbandingan Cepat

Ganti Pasangan Perbandingan

Granite 4.2 8BlowvsMistral Small 4mediumGranite 4.2 8BlowvsMistral Small 4noneGranite 4.2 8BlowvsNemotron 3.5 LightningmediumTersedia gratisGranite 4.2 8BlowvsQwen3 Coder NextnoneGranite 4.2 8BlowvsMiMo-V2.5noneGranite 4.2 8BlowvsQwen3.5-9BnoneLing-2.6-1TnonevsLaguna S 2.1highTersedia gratisNorth Mini CodenoneTersedia gratisvsGranite 4.2 8BlowGranite 4.2 8BlowvsInklingnoneDots 3 Note PreviewnoneTersedia gratisvsGranite 4.2 8BlowGranite 4.2 8BmediumvsLing-2.6-1TnoneLing-2.6-1TnonevsKAT-Coder-Air V2.5low