- Rank
- #200
- Total Output Tokens
- 20,076
- Response Time (avg)
- 11.10s
- Total Cost
- $0.451
GLM 5.1 vs GLM 5.3 (low)
The average score is effectively tied at 6.5 vs 6.5. GLM 5.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.451 vs $0.471. GLM 5.1 is faster at 11.10s vs 15.18s, with pass rates of 47.8% vs 63.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #199
- Total Output Tokens
- 28,106
- Response Time (avg)
- 15.18s
- Total Cost
- $0.471
Recommended model
GLM 5.1
It has the strongest score in this comparison (6.5) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.
Detailed comparison
| Metric | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 none | GLM 5.3 GLM 5.3 low |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 6.5 | 6.5 |
| Rank | #200 | #199 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 8.2 | 8.3 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 47.8% | 63.8% |
| Flaky tests | 5 | 5 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 3.478 | 3.923 |
| Total Cost | $0.451 | $0.471 |
| Input Price | $1.400 / 1M | $1.400 / 1M |
| Output Price | $4.400 / 1M | $4.400 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | $0.260 / 1M | $0.140 / 1M |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 258,956 | 247,871 |
| Output Tokens | 20,076 | 10,791 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 0 | 17,315 |
| Response Time (avg) | 11.10s | 15.18s |
| Response Time (max) | 107.19s | 83.60s |
| Response Time (total) | 255.39s | 349.06s |
| Parameters | 744B total (40B active) | 744B total (40B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Closed |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#200 GLM 5.1
none
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
#199 GLM 5.3
low- Cost
- $0.007
- Time
- 28.4s
- Tokens
- 1,599 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
KAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGLM 5.1noneGrok 4.3mediumvsGLM 5.1noneMercury 2.5highvsGLM 5.3lowLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.1noneMercury 2.5 PreviewhighvsGLM 5.3lowKAT-Coder-Pro V2.5highvsGLM 5.3lowGrok 4.3mediumvsGLM 5.3lowMercury 2.5highvsGLM 5.1noneQwen3.6 35B A3BmediumvsGLM 5.3lowLaguna XS 2.1mediumFree AvailablevsGLM 5.3lowMercury 2.5 PreviewhighvsGLM 5.1noneQwen3.5-122B-A10BnonevsGLM 5.3low