Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Solar Pro 4 vs GLM 5

The average score is effectively tied at 5.8 vs 5.7. Solar Pro 4 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.006 vs $0.041. GLM 5 is faster at 4.03s vs 4.90s, with pass rates of 31.8% vs 42.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-11

Rank
#175
Total Output Tokens
11,911
Response Time (avg)
4.90s
Total Cost
$0.006
Rank
#177
Total Output Tokens
1,989
Response Time (avg)
4.03s
Total Cost
$0.041
Recommended model Solar Pro 4

It has the best score here (5.8), while costing about 7.5x less than GLM 5.

Detailed comparison

Metric Solar Pro 4 Solar Pro 4 none Release: 2026-08-11 GLM 5 GLM 5 none Release: 2026-02-12
Score 5.8 5.7
Rank #175 #177
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 9.3
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 21/22 tests · 63/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 31.8% 42.4%
Flaky tests 0 1
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 0.077 0.263
Total Cost $0.006 $0.041
Input Price $0.030 / 1M $0.950 / 1M
Output Price $0.120 / 1M $2.551 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 130,854 37,135
Output Tokens 11,911 1,989
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.90s 4.03s
Response Time (max) 64.67s 11.07s
Response Time (total) 107.82s 56.37s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#175 Solar Pro 4

none
No showcase result has been generated for this model yet.
Cost
$0.000
Time
-
Tokens
0 tok

#177 GLM 5

none
Cost
$0.007
Time
32.1s
Tokens
2,023 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Solar Pro 4 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 2.61s 7,896 557 0
GLM 5 4.0 7.8 11.1% 1 5.12s 7,256 428 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair