Navigate
Advertise here

Qwen3.8 27B (low) vs Grok 4.7 (low)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.9 vs 7.9. Qwen3.8 27B (low) has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.071 vs $1.320. Qwen3.8 27B (low) is faster at 39.11s vs 59.02s, with pass rates of 68.2% vs 77.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-21

Compared models

Rank
#85
Total Output Tokens
169,329
Response Time (avg)
39.11s
Total Cost
~$0.071
Rank
#81
Total Output Tokens
231,848
Response Time (avg)
59.02s
Total Cost
$1.320
Recommended model Qwen3.8 27B (low)

It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 18.6x less than Grok 4.7 (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Qwen3.8 27B Qwen3.8 27B low Release: 2026-08-14 Grok 4.7 Grok 4.7 low Release: 2026-09-21
Score 7.9 7.9
Rank #85 #81
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 10.0 8.3
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 68.2% 77.3%
Flaky tests 0 5
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result ~0.473 9.422
Total Cost ~$0.071 $1.320
Input Price N/A $1.600 / 1M
Output Price N/A $4.800 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 99,705 128,832
Output Tokens 1,545 6,840
Reasoning Tokens 167,784 225,008
Response Time (avg) 39.11s 59.02s
Response Time (max) 376.04s 389.63s
Response Time (total) 860.51s 1298.42s
Parameters 27.3B ~1.7T total (~170B active)
Availability Weights available Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#85 Qwen3.8 27B

low
Cost
~$0.003
Time
92.8s
Tokens
6,902 tok

#81 SpaceXAI: Grok 4.7

low
Cost
$0.007
Time
15.2s
Tokens
1,537 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Qwen3.8 27B 7.7 10.0 66.7% 0 140.92s 8,127 585 86,694
Grok 4.7 8.4 7.4 88.9% 1 189.08s 9,579 346 99,053

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair