Navigate
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

GPT-5.6 Terra vs Qwen3.8 Flash Next

The average score is effectively tied at 5.8 vs 5.8. Qwen3.8 Flash Next has the lower benchmark cost at ~$0.011 vs $0.377. GPT-5.6 Terra is faster at 4.11s vs 5.71s, with pass rates of 40.6% vs 43.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-05

Compared models

Rank
#259
Total Output Tokens
7,381
Response Time (avg)
4.11s
Total Cost
$0.377
Rank
#258
Total Output Tokens
9,077
Response Time (avg)
5.71s
Total Cost
~$0.011
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Flash Next

It has the best score here (5.8), while costing about 34.8x less than GPT-5.6 Terra.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra none Release: 2026-07-09 Qwen3.8 Flash Next Qwen3.8 Flash Next none Release: 2026-10-04
Score 5.8 5.8
Rank #259 #258
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.0 9.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 40.6% 43.5%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 7.313 ~0.136
Total Cost $0.377 ~$0.011
Input Price $2.000 / 1M N/A
Output Price $12.000 / 1M N/A
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M N/A
Cache Write Price $2.500 / 1M N/A
Total Input Tokens 213,564 266,004
Output Tokens 7,381 9,077
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 4.11s 5.71s
Response Time (max) 57.98s 65.25s
Response Time (total) 94.52s 131.36s
Parameters ~1T total (~60B active) 180B total (6B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#259 GPT-5.6 Terra

none
Cost
$0.030
Time
14.7s
Tokens
2,082 tok

#258 Qwen3.8 Flash Next

none
Cost
~$0.001
Time
27.5s
Tokens
2,983 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.00s 7,302 336 0
Qwen3.8 Flash Next 5.5 10.0 33.3% 0 1.64s 7,911 669 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Ling 3.0 FlashhighvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneRing 2.6 1tmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsGPT-5.6 TerranoneLing 3.0 FlashhighvsQwen3.8 Flash Nextnonegpt-oss-120bmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextnoneRing 2.6 1tmediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextnoneTrinity Large ThinkinghighvsQwen3.8 Flash NextnoneDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailablevsGPT-5.6 TerranoneGemini 3.1 Flash LiteminimalvsQwen3.8 Flash NextnoneGPT-5 NanomediumvsQwen3.8 Flash NextnoneQwen3.8 Flash NextnonevsInkling SmallmediumFree AvailableDots 3 Note PreviewmediumFree AvailablevsQwen3.8 Flash Nextnone