Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Terra vs Z.ai: GLM 5.2

The average score is effectively tied at 7.8 vs 7.8. GLM 5.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.184 vs $0.676. GPT-5.6 Terra (medium) is faster at 7.11s vs 23.28s, with pass rates of 69.7% vs 80.3%.

Recommended modelGLM 5.2 (medium)It has the best score here (7.8), while costing about 3.7x less than GPT-5.6 Terra (medium).

Last updated at: 2026-07-25

Metric GPT-5.6 Terra GPT-5.6 Terra medium Release: 2026-07-09 GLM 5.2 GLM 5.2 medium Release: 2026-06-17
Score 7.8 7.8
Rank #46 #45
Reliability 10.0 9.5
Consistency 9.3 8.0
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 69.7% 80.3%
Flaky tests 2 4
Total Runs 66 63
Cost per result 4.825 2.159
Total Cost $0.676 $0.184
Input Price $2.500 / 1M $0.793 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $2.491 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 79,175 37,199
Output Tokens 4,878 12,261
Reasoning Tokens 26,952 49,500
Response Time (avg) 7.11s 23.28s
Response Time (max) 41.68s 101.36s
Response Time (total) 156.42s 488.94s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#46 GPT-5.6 Terra

medium
Cost
$0.035
Time
16.3s
Tokens
2,418 tok

#45 GLM 5.2

medium
Cost
$0.041
Time
195.8s
Tokens
9,287 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Terra 6.1 7.2 55.6% 1 7.19s 7,302 427 4,527
GLM 5.2 8.2 7.2 88.9% 1 40.96s 7,317 1,475 17,123

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair