Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

GPT-5.6 Luna vs Laguna XS 2.1

GPT-5.6 Luna leads on average score with 5.4 vs 5.3. Laguna XS 2.1 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.008 vs $0.029. GPT-5.6 Luna is faster at 1.50s vs 1.55s, with pass rates of 36.4% vs 30.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#221
Total Output Tokens
6,709
Response Time (avg)
1.50s
Total Cost
$0.029
Rank
#227
Total Output Tokens
13,377
Response Time (avg)
1.55s
Total Cost
$0.008
Recommended model Laguna XS 2.1

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.3 vs 5.4), while costing about 4.0x less than GPT-5.6 Luna.

Detailed comparison

Metric GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna none Release: 2026-07-09 Laguna XS 2.1 Laguna XS 2.1 none Release: 2026-07-02 Free Available
Score 5.4 5.3
Rank #221 #227
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 9.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 36.4% 30.3%
Flaky tests 3 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.357 0.143
Total Cost $0.029 $0.008
Input Price $0.200 / 1M $0.060 / 1M
Output Price $1.200 / 1M $0.120 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 101,332 91,607
Output Tokens 6,709 13,377
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 1.50s 1.55s
Response Time (max) 10.57s 19.02s
Response Time (total) 33.05s 34.01s
Parameters ~400B total (~17B active) 33B total (3B active)
Availability Closed Weights available

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#221 GPT-5.6 Luna

none
Cost
$0.016
Time
15.8s
Tokens
2,685 tok

#227 Laguna XS 2.1

none
Cost
$0.001
Time
27.6s
Tokens
4,344 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
GPT-5.6 Luna 3.8 7.2 22.2% 1 980ms 7,302 459 0
Laguna XS 2.1 4.3 7.8 22.2% 1 623ms 7,995 562 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair