Navigate
Advertise here

Muse Wonder (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (high)

Muse Wonder (medium) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 9.1. Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $3.306 vs $3.397. Muse Wonder (medium) is faster at 21.58s vs 186.06s, with pass rates of 76.8% vs 87.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-13

Compared models

Rank
#30
Total Output Tokens
121,546
Response Time (avg)
21.58s
Total Cost
$3.397
Rank
#34
Total Output Tokens
441,352
Response Time (avg)
186.06s
Total Cost
$3.306
Recommended model Muse Wonder (medium)

It has the best score here (9.2), while responding about 8.6x faster than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (high).

Detailed comparison

Metric Muse Wonder Muse Wonder medium Release: 2026-10-13 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) high Release: 2026-09-07
Score 9.2 9.1
Rank #30 #34
Reliability 9.1 9.8
Consistency 9.6 9.1
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 76.8% 87.0%
Flaky tests 1 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 19.982 18.364
Total Cost $3.397 $3.306
Input Price $4.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $20.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.200 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 241,489 328,637
Output Tokens 11,575 8,619
Reasoning Tokens 109,971 432,733
Response Time (avg) 21.58s 186.06s
Response Time (max) 162.73s 912.78s
Response Time (total) 496.40s 4279.49s
Parameters ~1T total (~50B active) 2.4T total (~100B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#30 Muse Wonder

medium
Cost
$0.208
Time
64.8s
Tokens
10,444 tok

#34 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

high
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Muse Wonder 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 26.87s 7,401 1,181 26,424
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 253.22s 8,235 418 91,734

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

GPT-5.3-CodexmediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsMuse WondermediumMuse WonderlowvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highQwen3.8 Max (0902)highvsParetodefaultClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highMuse WonderminimalvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highGPT-5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsMuse WondermediumClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Haiku 5.5xhighvsMuse WondermediumMuse WondermediumvsParetodefault