- Rank
- #401
- Total Output Tokens
- 911,748
- Response Time (avg)
- 64.99s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) vs Xing4.0 29b A4b (medium)
Xing4.0 29b A4b (medium) leads on average score with 3.7 vs 3.6. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) is faster at 64.99s vs 371.69s, with pass rates of 23.2% vs 26.1%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #398
- Total Output Tokens
- 107,980
- Response Time (avg)
- 371.69s
- Total Cost
- $0.000
Recommended model
Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (3.6 vs 3.7), while responding about 5.7x faster than Xing4.0 29b A4b (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny medium | Xing4.0 29b A4b Xing4.0 29b A4b medium Free Available |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 3.6 | 3.7 |
| Rank | #401 | #398 |
| Reliability | 9.6 | 7.3 |
| Consistency | 8.9 | 6.2 |
| Attempts | 69/69 | 69/69 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 23.2% | 26.1% |
| Flaky tests | 3 | 11 |
| Total Runs | 69 | 69 |
| Cost per result | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Total Cost | $0.000 | $0.000 |
| Input Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $0.000 / 1M | $0.000 / 1M |
| Cache Read Price | N/A | N/A |
| Cache Write Price | N/A | N/A |
| Total Input Tokens | 103,898 | 98,467 |
| Output Tokens | 148,304 | 3,385 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 774,972 | 104,595 |
| Response Time (avg) | 64.99s | 371.69s |
| Response Time (max) | 262.20s | 971.85s |
| Response Time (total) | 1429.68s | 8548.88s |
| Parameters | 7.9B total (1.3B active) | 29B total (4B active) |
| Availability | Open source | Open source |
Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#401 Ling 3.0 Tiny
medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 177.4s
- Tokens
- 6,873 tok
#398 Xing4.0 29b A4b
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 600.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Category Breakdown
| Agentic | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 24ms | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 579.54s | 54,965 | 405 | 5,479 |
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 23.73s | 750 | 5,103 | 94,884 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 3.8 | 1.6 | 50.0% | 4 | 145.43s | 487 | 582 | 14,049 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.9 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 211.99s | 7,948 | 70,838 | 206,006 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 4.2 | 5.1 | 33.3% | 2 | 798.00s | 1,889 | 502 | 27,115 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 139.78s | 76,108 | 17,871 | 126,497 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 898.87s | 20,856 | 736 | 25,295 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 2.7 | 5.7 | 16.7% | 1 | 4.41s | 8,016 | 2,014 | 6,755 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 2.9 | 5.9 | 16.7% | 1 | 147.51s | 8,397 | 283 | 7,766 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 81.40s | 637 | 21,709 | 187,100 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 381.86s | 264 | 6 | 4,373 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.8 | 2.5 | 33.3% | 1 | 31.77s | 546 | 4,275 | 30,975 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 3.2 | 9.9 | 0.0% | 0 | 121.15s | 528 | 87 | 2,517 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 6.8 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 3.00s | 744 | 610 | 1,436 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 4.3 | 6.8 | 16.7% | 1 | 25.45s | 300 | 56 | 1,280 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.6 | 7.2 | 22.2% | 1 | 34.65s | 747 | 15,561 | 85,029 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 2.9 | 4.4 | 22.2% | 2 | 257.08s | 537 | 222 | 13,616 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 4.91s | 8,226 | 380 | 708 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 56.09s | 10,183 | 503 | 866 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ling 3.0 Tiny | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 100.96s | 176 | 9,943 | 35,582 | |
| Xing4.0 29b A4b | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 755.91s | 61 | 3 | 2,239 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Ling 3.0 TinyhighvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinylowvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailablevsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinydefaultvsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsLing 3.0 TinymediumLing 3.0 TinymediumvsGrok 4.20noneGrok 4.20nonevsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree AvailableLing 3.0 TinymediumvsXing4.0 29b A4bnoneFree AvailableMercury 2.5nonevsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree Availablegpt-oss-120bnonevsXing4.0 29b A4bmediumFree Available