Navigate
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) vs LFM3-1.7B (default)

LFM3-1.7B (default) leads on average score with 4.1 vs 3.6. Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.000 vs $0.084. LFM3-1.7B (default) is faster at 16.99s vs 64.99s, with pass rates of 23.2% vs 34.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-11-10

Compared models

Rank
#443
Total Output Tokens
911,748
Response Time (avg)
64.99s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#430
Total Output Tokens
329,997
Response Time (avg)
16.99s
Total Cost
$0.084
Recommended model LFM3-1.7B (default)

It has the best score here (4.1), while responding about 3.8x faster than Ling 3.0 Tiny (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny medium Release: 2026-08-07 LFM3-1.7B LFM3-1.7B default Release: 2026-11-06 Free Available
Score 3.6 4.1
Rank #443 #430
Reliability 9.6 10.0
Consistency 8.9 8.2
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 23.2% 34.8%
Flaky tests 3 5
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 1.672
Total Cost $0.000 $0.084
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.080 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.200 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A $0.020 / 1M
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 103,898 219,830
Output Tokens 148,304 5,711
Reasoning Tokens 774,972 324,286
Response Time (avg) 64.99s 16.99s
Response Time (max) 262.20s 56.52s
Response Time (total) 1429.68s 390.77s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 1.7B
Availability Open source Weights available

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#443 Ling 3.0 Tiny

medium
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
177.4s
Tokens
6,873 tok

#430 LiquidAI: LFM3-1.7B

default
OpenRouter returned no showcase content (finish_reason: length).
Cost
$0.002
Time
23.3s
Tokens
8,320 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 211.99s 7,948 70,838 206,006
LFM3-1.7B 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 26.48s 7,461 0 73,728

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

LFM3-1.7BdefaultFree AvailablevsQwen3.5-9BmediumMercury 2.5nonevsLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree AvailableLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree Availablevsgpt-oss-120bnoneLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree AvailablevsGLM 4.7 FlashmediumLing 3.0 TinymediumvsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableGranite 4.1 8bdefaultvsLing 3.0 TinymediumLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree AvailablevsMiniMax M2.5mediumLing 3.0 TinymediumvsGrok 4.20noneLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree AvailablevsNemotron 3.5 LightningnoneFree AvailableMercury 2nonevsLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree AvailableCobuddymediumFree AvailablevsLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree AvailableGranite 4.2 8BnonevsLFM3-1.7BdefaultFree Available