Navigate
Advertise here

Ling 3.0 Tiny (high) vs Xing4.0 29b A4b

Ling 3.0 Tiny (high) leads on average score with 3.7 vs 3.3. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. Xing4.0 29b A4b is faster at 42.72s vs 72.24s, with pass rates of 23.2% vs 7.3%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-17

Compared models

Rank
#399
Total Output Tokens
939,018
Response Time (avg)
72.24s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#412
Total Output Tokens
26,540
Response Time (avg)
42.72s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model Ling 3.0 Tiny (high)

It has the strongest score in this comparison (3.7) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Ling 3.0 Tiny Ling 3.0 Tiny high Release: 2026-08-07 Xing4.0 29b A4b Xing4.0 29b A4b none Release: 2026-10-17 Free Available
Score 3.7 3.3
Rank #399 #412
Reliability 10.0 8.8
Consistency 8.9 8.6
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 23.2% 7.3%
Flaky tests 3 4
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.000 / 1M $0.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price N/A N/A
Cache Write Price N/A N/A
Total Input Tokens 115,314 153,665
Output Tokens 133,965 26,540
Reasoning Tokens 816,718 0
Response Time (avg) 72.24s 42.72s
Response Time (max) 345.15s 634.11s
Response Time (total) 1589.23s 982.66s
Parameters 7.9B total (1.3B active) 29B total (4B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#399 Ling 3.0 Tiny

high
No output was saved. The original provider response or failure reason is unavailable.
Cost
$0.000
Time
169.5s
Tokens
5,252 tok

#412 Xing4.0 29b A4b

none
Reached the allocated time limit (600 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
Cost
$0.000
Time
600.0s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ling 3.0 Tiny 2.9 10.0 0.0% 0 177.65s 7,767 59,320 177,922
Xing4.0 29b A4b 3.6 9.7 0.0% 0 231.73s 8,622 22,915 0

Switch Comparison Pair