Navigate
Advertise here

Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) vs Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low)

Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) leads on average score with 9.4 vs 8.6. Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.183 vs $1.131. Gemini 3.7 Flash (low) is faster at 6.24s vs 29.07s, with pass rates of 95.7% vs 85.5%.

Last updated at: 2026-10-19

Compared models

Rank
#26
Total Output Tokens
38,453
Response Time (avg)
6.24s
Total Cost
$0.183
Rank
#76
Total Output Tokens
88,923
Response Time (avg)
29.07s
Total Cost
$1.131
Recommended model Gemini 3.7 Flash (low)

It has the best score here (9.4), while costing about 6.2x less than Qwen3.8 Max (0902) (low).

Detailed comparison

Metric Gemini 3.7 Flash Gemini 3.7 Flash low Release: 2026-08-14 Qwen3.8 Max (0902) Qwen3.8 Max (0902) low Release: 2026-09-07
Score 9.4 8.6
Rank #26 #76
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.0
Attempts 69/69 69/69
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 95.7% 85.5%
Flaky tests 2 3
Total Runs 69 69
Cost per result 0.868 6.283
Total Cost $0.183 $1.131
Input Price $0.750 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $3.750 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Cache Read Price $0.075 / 1M $0.250 / 1M
Cache Write Price $0.042 / 1M $2.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 188,519 298,682
Output Tokens 7,694 8,374
Reasoning Tokens 30,759 80,549
Response Time (avg) 6.24s 29.07s
Response Time (max) 58.75s 207.79s
Response Time (total) 143.56s 668.66s
Parameters ~500B total (~20B active) 2.4T total (~100B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Cache prices apply to input tokens. Reads reuse cached prompts; writes store them and can cost extra. Output tokens use the output price.

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#26 Gemini 3.7 Flash

low
Cost
$0.010
Time
23.5s
Tokens
5,210 tok

#76 Qwen3.8 Max (0902)

low
Cost
$0.014
Time
41.2s
Tokens
2,421 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.7 Flash 7.6 7.2 77.8% 1 6.20s 8,118 461 11,508
Qwen3.8 Max (0902) 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 37.42s 8,127 485 17,404

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Opus 5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowClaude Opus 5mediumvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowvsGrok 4.6highClaude Sonnet 5.5highvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Opus 5.5highvsGemini 3.7 FlashlowClaude Sonnet 5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowDeepSeek V4.1 FlashmaxvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowClaude Haiku 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowSeed 2.1 TurbomediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowQwen3.8 Max (0902)lowvsMiMo-V2.6-PromediumGemini 3.7 FlashlowvsGPT-5.6 SolhighGPT-5.2mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)low