Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Google: Gemini 3.5 Flash vs Google: Gemini 3.6 Flash

Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) leads on average score with 9.9 vs 9.5. Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.831 vs $1.976. Gemini 3.6 Flash (medium) is faster at 10.11s vs 15.07s, with pass rates of 93.9% vs 98.5%.

Recommended modelGemini 3.6 Flash (medium)It has the best score here (9.9), while costing about 2.4x less than Gemini 3.5 Flash (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-21

Metric Gemini 3.5 Flash Gemini 3.5 Flash high Release: 2026-05-19 Gemini 3.6 Flash Gemini 3.6 Flash medium Release: 2026-07-21
Score 9.5 9.9
Rank #4 #1
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.3 9.6
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 93.9% 98.5%
Flaky tests 2 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 9.879 3.955
Total Cost $1.976 $0.831
Input Price $1.500 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Output Price $9.000 / 1M $7.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 107,137 66,293
Output Tokens 8,777 2,000
Reasoning Tokens 192,900 95,464
Response Time (avg) 15.07s 10.11s
Response Time (max) 145.92s 68.03s
Response Time (total) 331.48s 222.33s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#4 Gemini 3.5 Flash

high
Cost
$0.208
Time
118.2s
Tokens
23,158 tok

#1 Gemini 3.6 Flash

medium
Cost
$0.079
Time
47.9s
Tokens
10,532 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Gemini 3.5 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 22.96s 8,118 456 47,129
Gemini 3.6 Flash 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 17.49s 8,136 474 40,157

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair