- Rank
- #94
- Total Output Tokens
- 57,778
- Response Time (avg)
- 4.59s
- Total Cost
- $0.117
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium) vs Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium)
The average score is effectively tied at 7.4 vs 7.5. Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.024 vs $0.117. Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium) is faster at 3.58s vs 4.59s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 69.7%.
- Rank
- #91
- Total Output Tokens
- 127,034
- Response Time (avg)
- 3.58s
- Total Cost
- $0.024
Recommended model
Mercury 2.5 Preview (medium)
It has the best score here (7.5), while costing about 4.9x less than Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview (medium).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview medium | Mercury 2.5 Preview Mercury 2.5 Preview medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.4 | 7.5 |
| Rank | #94 | #91 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.9 | 9.6 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 63.6% | 69.7% |
| Flaky tests | 0 | 1 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 0.829 | 0.158 |
| Total Cost | $0.117 | $0.024 |
| Input Price | $0.250 / 1M | $0.040 / 1M |
| Output Price | $1.500 / 1M | $0.150 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 117,493 | 112,713 |
| Output Tokens | 10,589 | 5,436 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 47,189 | 121,598 |
| Response Time (avg) | 4.59s | 3.58s |
| Response Time (max) | 18.34s | 17.84s |
| Response Time (total) | 101.04s | 78.66s |
| Parameters | ~150B total (~10B active) | ~100B |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#94 Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview
medium- Cost
- $0.003
- Time
- 5.2s
- Tokens
- 1,944 tok
#91 Mercury 2.5 Preview
medium- Cost
- $0.001
- Time
- 2.7s
- Tokens
- 2,241 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 9.1 | 10.0 | 75.0% | 0 | 2.33s | 512 | 570 | 4,305 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.43s | 781 | 203 | 7,921 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 5.5 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 4.09s | 8,126 | 461 | 8,597 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 7.8 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 3.86s | 7,839 | 552 | 22,126 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 7.2 | 9.1 | 50.0% | 0 | 16.63s | 93,097 | 8,706 | 16,997 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 6.5 | 10.0 | 50.0% | 0 | 13.86s | 92,663 | 3,607 | 41,588 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.29s | 7,362 | 279 | 2,952 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 2.77s | 8,292 | 514 | 11,354 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 4.09s | 652 | 18 | 6,120 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.3 | 7.2 | 44.4% | 1 | 3.72s | 853 | 62 | 17,120 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.16s | 488 | 96 | 1,488 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 5.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.09s | 538 | 99 | 3,375 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.91s | 621 | 72 | 2,121 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 9.8 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.35s | 744 | 96 | 3,987 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 5.30s | 566 | 141 | 1,896 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 1.87s | 771 | 274 | 7,323 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 3.80s | 5,909 | 234 | 912 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.37s | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 2.68s | 160 | 12 | 1,801 | |
| Mercury 2.5 Preview | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 4.13s | 232 | 29 | 6,804 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Gemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsQwen3.7 MaxnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumvsGPT 5.3 ChatnoneMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerralowMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumvsQwen3.7 MaxnoneGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGPT 5.3 ChatnoneGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 TerralowGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighGemini 3.1 Flash Lite PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6lowMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumvsQwen3.8 2.4T A95BhighClaude Opus 5nonevsMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumvsSolar Pro 4xhighMercury 2.5 PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6low