Navigate
Advertise here

Ember-1 (low) vs Qwen3.5-27B (medium)

The average score is effectively tied at 7.5 vs 7.5. Ember-1 (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.662 vs $0.982. Ember-1 (low) is faster at 30.98s vs 113.28s, with pass rates of 66.7% vs 75.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-28

Compared models

Rank
#120
Total Output Tokens
37,467
Response Time (avg)
30.98s
Total Cost
$0.662
Rank
#124
Total Output Tokens
614,909
Response Time (avg)
113.28s
Total Cost
$0.982
Recommended model Ember-1 (low)

It has the best score here (7.5), while responding about 3.7x faster than Qwen3.5-27B (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Ember-1 Ember-1 low Release: 2026-09-28 Qwen3.5-27B Qwen3.5-27B medium Release: 2026-02-24
Score 7.5 7.5
Rank #120 #124
Reliability 8.1 10.0
Consistency 8.5 7.8
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 66.7% 75.8%
Flaky tests 4 6
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 5.085 8.217
Total Cost $0.662 $0.982
Input Price $3.000 / 1M $0.195 / 1M
Output Price $15.000 / 1M $1.560 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 33,011 111,644
Output Tokens 4,780 16,113
Reasoning Tokens 32,687 598,796
Response Time (avg) 30.98s 113.28s
Response Time (max) 93.10s 1026.43s
Response Time (total) 681.50s 2492.26s
Parameters ~2.8T total (~104B active) 27B
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#120 Ember-1

low
Cost
$0.016
Time
24.2s
Tokens
1,165 tok

#124 Qwen3.5-27B

medium
Cost
$0.008
Time
62.0s
Tokens
3,099 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Ember-1 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 37.91s 8,097 2,518 13,142
Qwen3.5-27B 6.2 7.1 55.6% 1 160.69s 7,895 6,381 89,388

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair