- Rank
- #158
- Total Output Tokens
- 110,125
- Response Time (avg)
- 56.77s
- Total Cost
- $1.798
Ember-1 (high) vs GLM 5.1 (medium)
Ember-1 (high) leads on average score with 7.1 vs 7.0. GLM 5.1 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.053 vs $1.798. Ember-1 (high) is faster at 56.77s vs 58.80s, with pass rates of 71.2% vs 65.2%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #164
- Total Output Tokens
- 215,889
- Response Time (avg)
- 58.80s
- Total Cost
- $1.053
Recommended model
GLM 5.1 (medium)
Its score stays close to the best score here (7.0 vs 7.1), while costing about 1.7x less than Ember-1 (high).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Ember-1 Ember-1 high | GLM 5.1 GLM 5.1 medium |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 7.1 | 7.0 |
| Rank | #158 | #164 |
| Reliability | 8.0 | 8.1 |
| Consistency | 7.3 | 8.4 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 71.2% | 65.2% |
| Flaky tests | 7 | 4 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 14.981 | 6.923 |
| Total Cost | $1.798 | $1.053 |
| Input Price | $3.000 / 1M | $1.400 / 1M |
| Output Price | $15.000 / 1M | $4.400 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 48,577 | 82,592 |
| Output Tokens | 7,345 | 16,089 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 102,780 | 199,800 |
| Response Time (avg) | 56.77s | 58.80s |
| Response Time (max) | 255.06s | 308.75s |
| Response Time (total) | 1248.88s | 1234.72s |
| Parameters | ~2.8T total (~104B active) | 744B total (40B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Open source |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#158 Ember-1
high- Cost
- $0.038
- Time
- 55.1s
- Tokens
- 2,671 tok
#164 GLM 5.1
medium
Reached the allocated time limit (300 seconds) without receiving showcase output.
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 300.0s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
GPT-5.5nonevsGLM 5.1mediumSpace Bunny AlphahighvsGLM 5.1mediumEmber-1highvsGrok 4.3mediumEmber-1highvsGPT-5.6 SolnoneEmber-1highvsGPT-6 LunalowGPT-6 LunalowvsGLM 5.1mediumDeepSeek V3.2mediumvsEmber-1highGPT-5.6 SolnonevsGLM 5.1mediumEmber-1highvsGPT-5.5noneEmber-1highvsMercury 2mediumEmber-1highvsGrok 4.20mediumClaude Fable 5.1lowvsGLM 5.1medium