Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

DeepSeek: DeepSeek V4 Flash vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

The average score is effectively tied at 7.7 vs 7.7. DeepSeek V4 Flash (high) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.042 vs $1.017. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) is faster at 18.68s vs 49.75s, with pass rates of 72.7% vs 72.7%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V4 Flash (high)It has the best score here (7.7), while costing about 24.3x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-22

Metric DeepSeek V4 Flash DeepSeek V4 Flash high Release: 2026-04-24 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high Release: 2026-07-09
Score 7.7 7.7
Rank #49 #48
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.2 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 72.7% 72.7%
Flaky tests 5 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.402 6.780
Total Cost $0.042 $1.017
Input Price $0.098 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $0.196 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,392 80,918
Output Tokens 14,478 5,088
Reasoning Tokens 153,687 150,910
Response Time (avg) 49.75s 18.68s
Response Time (max) 218.13s 111.09s
Response Time (total) 1094.41s 411.05s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#49 DeepSeek V4 Flash

high
Cost
$0.003
Time
93.1s
Tokens
7,926 tok

#48 GPT-5.6 Luna

high
Cost
$0.033
Time
34.2s
Tokens
5,484 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
DeepSeek V4 Flash 7.8 10.0 66.7% 0 50.60s 7,279 395 34,862
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 4.7 55.6% 2 15.63s 7,302 510 17,746

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair