Navigate
Advertise here

Command A+ — high vs medium

The average score is effectively tied at 3.0 vs 3.0. Benchmark cost is effectively tied at $0.000 vs $0.000. high is faster at 86.95s vs 90.76s, with pass rates of 0.0% vs 0.0%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-23

Compared models

Rank
#353
Total Output Tokens
0
Response Time (avg)
86.95s
Total Cost
$0.000
Rank
#355
Total Output Tokens
0
Response Time (avg)
90.76s
Total Cost
$0.000
Recommended model high

It has the strongest score in this comparison (3.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Detailed comparison

Metric Command A+ Command A+ high Release: 2026-09-23 Command A+ Command A+ medium Release: 2026-09-23
Score 3.0 3.0
Rank #353 #355
Reliability 0.0 0.0
Consistency 10.0 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 0.0% 0.0%
Flaky tests 0 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.000 0.000
Total Cost $0.000 $0.000
Input Price $0.300 / 1M $0.300 / 1M
Output Price $1.500 / 1M $1.500 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 0 0
Output Tokens 0 0
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 86.95s 90.76s
Response Time (max) 114.87s 105.69s
Response Time (total) 1913.01s 1996.78s
Parameters 218B total (25B active) 218B total (25B active)
Availability Open source Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#353 Command A+

high
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

#355 Command A+

medium
Provider returned error
Cost
$0.000
Time
0.2s
Tokens
0 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Command A+ 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 92.74s 0 0 0
Command A+ 3.0 10.0 0.0% 0 93.13s 0 0 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair