Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

AI BENCHY Compare

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Mini vs DeepSeek: DeepSeek V3.2

Summary

The average score is effectively tied at 7.0 vs 7.0. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.078 vs $0.101. DeepSeek V3.2 (medium) is faster at 68.62s vs 92.53s, with pass rates of 57.6% vs 65.2%.

Recommended modelDeepSeek V3.2 (medium)It has the strongest score in this comparison (7.0) and the best overall balance of cost and response time across all 2 models.

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Seed-2.0-Mini Seed-2.0-Mini medium Release: 2026-02-14 DeepSeek V3.2 DeepSeek V3.2 medium Release: 2025-12-01
Score 7.0 7.0
Rank #77 #73
Reliability 8.5 10.0
Consistency 8.9 7.4
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 57.6% 65.2%
Flaky tests 3 7
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 0.917 0.671
Total Cost $0.101 $0.078
Input Price $0.100 / 1M $0.269 / 1M
Output Price $0.400 / 1M $0.400 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 125,467 101,047
Output Tokens 10,778 11,834
Reasoning Tokens 209,856 117,014
Response Time (avg) 92.53s 68.62s
Response Time (max) 301.78s 376.10s
Response Time (total) 1665.50s 1509.53s

Generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#77 Seed-2.0-Mini

medium
Cost
$0.002
Time
161.7s
Tokens
4,379 tok

#73 DeepSeek V3.2

medium
Cost
$0.001
Time
53.6s
Tokens
1,932 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Mini 5.5 9.8 33.3% 0 220.48s 3,823 464 34,964
DeepSeek V3.2 6.0 7.2 55.6% 1 248.68s 5,717 649 52,014

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair