Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

ByteDance Seed: Seed-2.0-Lite vs OpenAI: GPT-5.6 Luna

Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) leads on average score with 7.9 vs 7.7. Seed-2.0-Lite (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.234 vs $1.017. GPT-5.6 Luna (high) is faster at 18.68s vs 48.53s, with pass rates of 74.2% vs 72.7%.

Recommended modelSeed-2.0-Lite (medium)It has the best score here (7.9), while costing about 4.4x less than GPT-5.6 Luna (high).

Last updated at: 2026-07-17

Metric Seed-2.0-Lite Seed-2.0-Lite medium Release: 2026-02-14 GPT-5.6 Luna GPT-5.6 Luna high Release: 2026-07-09
Score 7.9 7.7
Rank #33 #42
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.6 8.9
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 74.2% 72.7%
Flaky tests 4 3
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 1.669 6.780
Total Cost $0.234 $1.017
Input Price $0.250 / 1M $1.000 / 1M
Output Price $2.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 129,897 80,918
Output Tokens 12,533 5,088
Reasoning Tokens 88,047 150,910
Response Time (avg) 48.53s 18.68s
Response Time (max) 254.92s 111.09s
Response Time (total) 1067.74s 411.05s

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#33 Seed-2.0-Lite

medium
Cost
$0.005
Time
86.7s
Tokens
2,354 tok

#42 GPT-5.6 Luna

high
Cost
$0.033
Time
34.2s
Tokens
5,484 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Lite 8.0 9.8 66.7% 0 156.74s 8,247 458 31,890
GPT-5.6 Luna 5.5 4.7 55.6% 2 15.63s 7,302 510 17,746

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair