Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Seed-2.0-Code vs Mistral Small 4

Seed-2.0-Code leads on average score with 5.3 vs 5.1. Mistral Small 4 has the lower benchmark cost at $0.022 vs $0.151. Mistral Small 4 is faster at 1.20s vs 14.67s, with pass rates of 34.9% vs 25.8%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-12

Rank
#219
Total Output Tokens
23,432
Response Time (avg)
14.67s
Total Cost
$0.151
Rank
#222
Total Output Tokens
9,812
Response Time (avg)
1.20s
Total Cost
$0.022
Recommended model Mistral Small 4

Its score stays close to the best score here (5.1 vs 5.3), while costing about 7.0x less than Seed-2.0-Code.

Detailed comparison

Metric Seed-2.0-Code Seed-2.0-Code none Release: 2026-08-12 Mistral Small 4 Mistral Small 4 none Release: 2026-03-16
Score 5.3 5.1
Rank #219 #222
Reliability 6.7 10.0
Consistency 8.1 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 34.9% 25.8%
Flaky tests 5 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 2.503 0.432
Total Cost $0.151 $0.022
Input Price $0.500 / 1M $0.150 / 1M
Output Price $3.000 / 1M $0.600 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 159,740 104,708
Output Tokens 23,432 9,812
Reasoning Tokens 0 0
Response Time (avg) 14.67s 1.20s
Response Time (max) 132.84s 13.16s
Response Time (total) 322.75s 26.38s
Parameters ~200B total (~20B active) 119B total (6B active)
Availability Closed Open source

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#219 Seed-2.0-Code

none
Cost
$0.030
Time
140.6s
Tokens
9,924 tok

#222 Mistral Small 4

none
Cost
$0.002
Time
10.4s
Tokens
2,370 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Seed-2.0-Code 3.6 9.8 0.0% 0 13.42s 7,230 505 0
Mistral Small 4 3.7 9.7 0.0% 0 901ms 7,636 619 0

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair