Navigate
Advertise here

Claude Opus 5 (medium) vs GPT-6.1 Sol (low)

GPT-6.1 Sol (low) leads on average score with 9.5 vs 9.2. GPT-6.1 Sol (low) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.275 vs $1.586. GPT-6.1 Sol (low) is faster at 5.36s vs 10.26s, with pass rates of 83.3% vs 92.4%.

Last updated at: 2026-09-29

Compared models

Rank
#30
Total Output Tokens
36,618
Response Time (avg)
10.26s
Total Cost
$1.586
Rank
#16
Total Output Tokens
11,879
Response Time (avg)
5.36s
Total Cost
$0.275
Recommended model GPT-6.1 Sol (low)

It has the best score here (9.5), while costing about 5.8x less than Claude Opus 5 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 5 Claude Opus 5 medium Release: 2026-07-25 GPT-6.1 Sol GPT-6.1 Sol low Release: 2026-09-29
Score 9.2 9.5
Rank #30 #16
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.6
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 83.3% 92.4%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 8.811 1.375
Total Cost $1.586 $0.275
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $10.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 135,604 78,018
Output Tokens 23,814 4,160
Reasoning Tokens 12,804 7,719
Response Time (avg) 10.26s 5.36s
Response Time (max) 35.43s 29.38s
Response Time (total) 225.66s 117.89s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) ~2T total (~150B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#30 Claude Opus 5

medium
Cost
$0.125
Time
69.3s
Tokens
5,134 tok

#16 GPT-6.1 Sol

low
Cost
$0.028
Time
44.6s
Tokens
2,881 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 5 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 9.56s 10,590 5,224 1,162
GPT-6.1 Sol 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 4.48s 7,302 388 1,286

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair