- Rank
- #35
- Total Output Tokens
- 27,194
- Response Time (avg)
- 24.18s
- Total Cost
- $1.080
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) vs Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)
The average score is effectively tied at 9.0 vs 9.0. Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.080 vs $7.545. Claude Opus 5.5 (medium) is faster at 24.18s vs 83.04s, with pass rates of 89.4% vs 81.8%.
Compared models
- Rank
- #39
- Total Output Tokens
- 727,349
- Response Time (avg)
- 83.04s
- Total Cost
- $7.545
Recommended model
Claude Opus 5.5 (medium)
It has the best score here (9.0), while costing about 7.0x less than Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max).
Detailed comparison
| Metric | Claude Opus 5.5 Claude Opus 5.5 medium | Claude Sonnet 5.5 Claude Sonnet 5.5 max |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Rank | #35 | #39 |
| Reliability | 10.0 | 10.0 |
| Consistency | 9.6 | 9.4 |
| Attempts | 66/66 | 66/66 |
| Tests Correct | ||
| Attempt pass rate | 89.4% | 81.8% |
| Flaky tests | 1 | 2 |
| Total Runs | 66 | 66 |
| Cost per result | 5.683 | 44.380 |
| Total Cost | $1.080 | $7.545 |
| Input Price | $4.000 / 1M | $2.000 / 1M |
| Output Price | $20.000 / 1M | $10.000 / 1M |
| Total Input Tokens | 133,954 | 135,496 |
| Output Tokens | 7,292 | 8,153 |
| Reasoning Tokens | 19,902 | 719,196 |
| Response Time (avg) | 24.18s | 83.04s |
| Response Time (max) | 90.20s | 488.39s |
| Response Time (total) | 532.04s | 1826.84s |
| Parameters | ~5T total (~500B active) | ~1T total (~100B active) |
| Availability | Closed | Closed |
Model generation showcase
Hamster playing table tennis
Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.
#35 Claude Opus 5.5
medium- Cost
- $0.053
- Time
- 25.6s
- Tokens
- 2,781 tok
#39 Claude Sonnet 5.5
max
OpenRouter returned no showcase content (finish_reason: length).
- Cost
- $0.000
- Time
- 571.7s
- Tokens
- 0 tok
Top Models by Score
Score vs Total Cost
Response Time (avg)
Score vs Response Time (avg)
Total Output Tokens
Score vs Total Output Tokens
Category Breakdown
| Anti-AI Tricks | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.42s | 858 | 321 | 657 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 5.39s | 858 | 397 | 3,109 |
| Coding | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 8.4 | 7.4 | 88.9% | 1 | 13.50s | 10,608 | 636 | 4,341 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 55.26s | 10,608 | 580 | 70,730 |
| Combined | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 55.69s | 96,679 | 4,639 | 4,527 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 113.57s | 97,957 | 5,219 | 95,067 |
| Data parsing and extraction | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 12.65s | 10,515 | 312 | 277 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 16.07s | 10,515 | 312 | 10,487 |
| Domain specific | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 7.7 | 10.0 | 66.7% | 0 | 21.35s | 990 | 61 | 8,360 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 5.3 | 10.0 | 33.3% | 0 | 401.38s | 990 | 19 | 485,043 |
| General Intelligence | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.17s | 714 | 273 | 326 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 5.1 | 3.4 | 33.3% | 1 | 56.66s | 714 | 322 | 20,156 |
| Instructions following | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 21.33s | 921 | 96 | 336 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 8.5 | 6.8 | 83.3% | 1 | 6.24s | 921 | 98 | 2,263 |
| Puzzle Solving | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 30.12s | 912 | 513 | 491 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 6.17s | 912 | 578 | 3,186 |
| Tool Calling | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 74.20s | 11,757 | 441 | 587 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 10.0 | 10.0 | 100.0% | 0 | 41.40s | 11,757 | 354 | 12,232 |
| Trivia | Score | Consistency | Attempt pass rate | Flaky tests | Tests Correct | Response Time (avg) | Input Tokens | Output Tokens | Reasoning Tokens |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Opus 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 27.75s | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Claude Sonnet 5.5 | 3.0 | 10.0 | 0.0% | 0 | 47.01s | 264 | 274 | 16,923 |
Quick Compare
Switch Comparison Pair
Claude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 MaxmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGPT-5.5mediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGemini 3.5 FlashmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGrok 4.5highClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsGrok 4.5highClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsGPT-5.3-CodexmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsQwen3.7 MaxmediumClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsMuse Spark 1.3highClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsSeed 2.1 TurbolowClaude Opus 5.5mediumvsQwen3.8 Max (0902)highClaude Sonnet 5.5maxvsParetonone