Navigate
AI BENCHY
Advertise here

Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) vs Qwen3.8 Max (medium)

Qwen3.8 Max (medium) leads on average score with 9.1 vs 8.8. Qwen3.8 Max (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $0.728 vs $1.931. Claude Opus 4.8 (medium) is faster at 12.49s vs 21.53s, with pass rates of 84.9% vs 84.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-04

Rank
#19
Total Output Tokens
49,841
Response Time (avg)
12.49s
Total Cost
$1.931
Rank
#14
Total Output Tokens
84,826
Response Time (avg)
21.53s
Total Cost
$0.728
Recommended model Qwen3.8 Max (medium)

It has the best score here (9.1), while costing about 2.7x less than Claude Opus 4.8 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.8 Claude Opus 4.8 medium Release: 2026-05-28 Qwen3.8 Max Qwen3.8 Max medium Release: 2026-08-04
Score 8.8 9.1
Rank #19 #14
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 9.6 9.7
Benchmark coverage 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts 22/22 tests · 66/66 attempts
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 84.9% 84.9%
Flaky tests 1 1
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 10.724 4.040
Total Cost $1.931 $0.728
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $6.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 138,451 109,046
Output Tokens 40,766 6,567
Reasoning Tokens 9,075 78,259
Response Time (avg) 12.49s 21.53s
Response Time (max) 70.54s 126.60s
Response Time (total) 274.72s 473.75s

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#19 Claude Opus 4.8

medium
Cost
$0.057
Time
23.1s
Tokens
2,412 tok

#14 Qwen3.8 Max

medium
Cost
$0.028
Time
71.9s
Tokens
4,750 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.8 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 15.33s 10,590 9,945 1,381
Qwen3.8 Max 10.0 10.0 100.0% 0 41.35s 7,893 430 23,804

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair