Navigate
AI BENCHY
AD
Track all your projects in one dashboard. Get 📊stats, 🔥heatmaps and 👀recordings in one self-hosted dashboard.
uxwizz.com

Claude Opus 4.6 (medium) vs Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium)

Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) leads on average score with 9.2 vs 7.7. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) has the lower benchmark cost at $1.352 vs $2.961. Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium) is faster at 20.62s vs 32.23s, with pass rates of 63.6% vs 90.9%.

Last updated at: 2026-08-20

Rank
#74
Total Output Tokens
96,722
Response Time (avg)
32.23s
Total Cost
$2.961
Rank
#12
Total Output Tokens
97,238
Response Time (avg)
20.62s
Total Cost
$1.352
Recommended model Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (medium)

It has the best score here (9.2), while costing about 2.2x less than Claude Opus 4.6 (medium).

Detailed comparison

Metric Claude Opus 4.6 Claude Opus 4.6 medium Release: 2026-02-05 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview medium Release: 2026-02-19
Score 7.7 9.2
Rank #74 #12
Reliability 10.0 10.0
Consistency 8.8 10.0
Attempts 66/66 66/66
Tests Correct
Attempt pass rate 63.6% 90.9%
Flaky tests 3 0
Total Runs 66 66
Cost per result 22.777 6.758
Total Cost $2.961 $1.352
Input Price $5.000 / 1M $2.000 / 1M
Output Price $25.000 / 1M $12.000 / 1M
Total Input Tokens 108,573 92,296
Output Tokens 69,994 5,232
Reasoning Tokens 26,728 92,006
Response Time (avg) 32.23s 20.62s
Response Time (max) 151.51s 88.68s
Response Time (total) 515.65s 329.94s
Parameters ~5T total (~500B active) ~1.2T total (~20B active)
Availability Closed Closed

Model generation showcase

Hamster playing table tennis

Prompt: Create a detailed SVG illustration of a hamster playing table tennis.

#74 Claude Opus 4.6

medium
Invalid SVG
Cost
$0.000
Time
300.0s
Tokens
0 tok

#12 Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview

medium
Cost
$0.115
Time
87.2s
Tokens
9,629 tok

Top Models by Score

Score vs Total Cost

Response Time (avg)

Score vs Response Time (avg)

Total Output Tokens

Score vs Total Output Tokens

Category Breakdown

Coding Score Consistency Attempt pass rate Flaky tests Tests Correct Response Time (avg) Input Tokens Output Tokens Reasoning Tokens
Claude Opus 4.6 5.7 7.1 44.4% 1 30.10s 8,522 13,057 4,121
Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview 7.9 9.9 66.7% 0 40.17s 8,124 435 41,247

Quick Compare

Switch Comparison Pair

Claude Opus 4.6mediumvsSeed-2.0-CodelowClaude Opus 5highvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsDeepSeek V4 ProhighClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsQwen3.7 FlashhighClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsDeepSeek V4 Flash 0423highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGrok 4.6highGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.5lowGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumvsGPT-5.6 SolhighClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsGPT-5.6 LunahighClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsSolar Pro 4xhighSeed 2.1 TurbolowvsGemini 3.1 Pro PreviewmediumClaude Opus 4.6mediumvsQwen3.8 27Blow